Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp57070igc; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:46:38 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.59.240 with SMTP id c16mr10932686wjr.13.1387140397899; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:46:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ds6si2742705wib.30.2013.12.15.12.46.37 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:46:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VsI85-0003eq-7U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:17:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VsI84-0003eh-Mp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:17:32 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VsI82-0007vG-EG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:17:31 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBFKHT6Y027733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:17:29 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBFKHS9a014763 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:17:29 +0100 Message-ID: <52AE0E53.60506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:17:23 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ADD9C8.2000700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002c01cef9d1$8611d600$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> In-Reply-To: <002c01cef9d1$8611d600$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rBFKHT6Y027733 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay, Am 15.12.2013 21:09, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > > What is the overall antenna R now? On VLF? Well, i'm getting 850 mA at 400W, i.e. 550 Ohm. If i remember correctly, the coil has 320 Ohm, so the sourrounding losses are 230 Ohm. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4e28719a46cd3d69582e1b8d1c614db3 Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2153 Hi Jay, Am 15.12.2013 21:09, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > > What is the overall antenna R now? On VLF? Well, i'm getting 850 mA at 400W, i.e. 550 Ohm. If i remember=20 correctly, the coil has 320 Ohm, so the sourrounding losses are 230 Ohm. > With the kite of years gone by? Who knows. At least there are no concrete plans in the moment. But it=20 would be nice :-) The fixed antenna has some real advantages. But i will never generate a=20 signal in the range of 58 mW ERP with that one.. > > Miss reading and seeing the pictures of your escapades in the field. :-) 73, Stefan > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer"=20 > > To: ; "Paul" > Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 11:33 AM > Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC > > > Hi Peter, VLF, > > Did you see a trace on your grabber? Can you show me a link or a=20 > screenshot? > The signal is well visible on Paul Nicholson's excellent VLF grabber, > http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=3D1387116000&b=3D110&s=3Dsp but fa= r from > stable. Is instability is due to my signal of course. Distance to Paul > is 880 km, http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html?qth=3DIO83XQ&from=3Djn49i= k00wd > > You are right, there are many things to optimise. One thing is the > housing of the PA. Now it is just mounted on a wooden plate. It is a H > bridge using 4x IRFP460, switching directly at 230V*1.41, so the output > of the PA is on mains potential! There is no galvanic decoupling > transformer on the output (which would allow to use a grounded coax > then) because such a transformer would have to be a VERY big ferrite > core with many many turns (> 100). So the PA output is directly > connected to the primary winding of the loading coil, which couples its > field into the resonance winding (1200 turns). So the feed line is > floating on an unknown voltage which depends on the capacitive coupling > to sourrounding things. In the field experiments 2010/2011 this was no > problem. But now it is. I guess this is causing EMC problems to the /2 > frequency divider, sometimes. Thus, i will put it into a metallic box > which is grounded to earth potential. > > Another problem is the parallel capacitor which i have to add to come o= n > resonance. It's capacity is not high enough and i have to add about 10m > or wire hanging arround. This additional wire is moving in the wind > blasts and causes further instability of the signal (kind of AM due to > modulated resonance peak, i.e. antenna current). Another way would be t= o > add more turns to the coil but this antenna system is voltage limited > and it doesn't matter at all if i have to put 400W or 500W into the=20 > system. > > BTW this night/day it was 850 mA antenna current and about 400W RF > power. I will plan to do more QRO, when the new capacitor is ready to=20 > use. > > Here is an image of the arrangement, taken 30 minutes ago: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/20131215_165406.jpg > > As soon as the C of "DK7FC" is finished, i will run some OPDS32 > sequences for DF6NM and Paul Nicholson and others :-) > BTW i have disconnected my VLF grabber antenna since the RX is > overloaded anyway. Now it is easier to identify eventual phase glitches > (could be on the RX side as well, though). > > 73 and thanks for watching. > > Stefan/DK7FC > > > > Am 15.12.2013 14:49, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: >> Stefan, >> Signal is O.K., but stabillity is'nt :-( >> To much spread around center frequency. >> >> (I know.... I'm complaining about 0.01 Hz drift..........) >> >> 73's Peter >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer"=20 >> >> To: ; "Paul" >> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:14 AM >> Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC >> >> >> Since 4:10 UTC, the signal is available without interruptions now on >> 8.97000500 kHz. >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> Am 14.12.2013 20:50, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Tomorrow the rain probability is just 10% and so i think i can risk=20 >>> to run a short VLF experiment on 8970.00500 Hz. I'm using the fixed=20 >>> antenna at JN49IK00WD. These days, the QRN is very low for quite a=20 >>> long time! The plan is to run about 500W RF power, or more,=20 >>> depending on the voltage limit of the antenna. And the plan is to=20 >>> start transmitting tonite, after the experiment with VO1NA, i.e.=20 >>> i'll come on air arround 2 UTC, hopefully. I will run the test until=20 >>> the late afternoon. First i'm TXing a stable frequency until 9 UTC,=20 >>> later some DFCW-600, and then maybe some tests in OPDS32. >>> Suggestions welcome. >>> BUT it all depends on the WX. If it starts to rain then i have to sto= p. >>> Will someone give it a try and watch for me? >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >