Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp7225igc; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:46:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.187.101 with SMTP id fr5mr1621816wjc.76.1387082795765; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:46:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si3003947wjo.151.2013.12.14.20.46.35 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vs35t-00071I-Tw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:14:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vs35t-000719-Gi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:14:17 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vs35r-0004LY-TM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:14:16 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBF4ED5v012489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:14:14 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBF4ECET015695; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:14:12 +0100 Message-ID: <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:14:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, Paul References: <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rBF4ED5v012489 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Since 4:10 UTC, the signal is available without interruptions now on 8.97000500 kHz. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.12.2013 20:50, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Hi all, > > Tomorrow the rain probability is just 10% and so i think i can risk to > run a short VLF experiment on 8970.00500 Hz. I'm using the fixed > antenna at JN49IK00WD. These days, the QRN is very low for quite a > long time! The plan is to run about 500W RF power, or more, depending > on the voltage limit of the antenna. And the plan is to start > transmitting tonite, after the experiment with VO1NA, i.e. i'll come > on air arround 2 UTC, hopefully. I will run the test until the late > afternoon. First i'm TXing a stable frequency until 9 UTC, later some > DFCW-600, and then maybe some tests in OPDS32. > Suggestions welcome. > BUT it all depends on the WX. If it starts to rain then i have to stop. > Will someone give it a try and watch for me? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2147 Since 4:10 UTC, the signal is available without interruptions now on=20 8.97000500 kHz. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.12.2013 20:50, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Hi all, > > Tomorrow the rain probability is just 10% and so i think i can risk to=20 > run a short VLF experiment on 8970.00500 Hz. I'm using the fixed=20 > antenna at JN49IK00WD. These days, the QRN is very low for quite a=20 > long time! The plan is to run about 500W RF power, or more, depending=20 > on the voltage limit of the antenna. And the plan is to start=20 > transmitting tonite, after the experiment with VO1NA, i.e. i'll come=20 > on air arround 2 UTC, hopefully. I will run the test until the late=20 > afternoon. First i'm TXing a stable frequency until 9 UTC, later some=20 > DFCW-600, and then maybe some tests in OPDS32. > Suggestions welcome. > BUT it all depends on the WX. If it starts to rain then i have to stop. > Will someone give it a try and watch for me? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC