Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp7226igc; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:46:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.48.74 with SMTP id j10mr8042661wjn.41.1387082797001; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:46:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id li4si1811949wic.55.2013.12.14.20.46.36 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vs34h-000713-2l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:13:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vs34d-00070u-4Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:12:59 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vs34b-0004LE-5I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:12:57 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBF4CtL2026836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:12:55 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBF4Crn7015667 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:12:53 +0100 Message-ID: <52AD2C42.8@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:12:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <205101cef911$3bbc9ce0$b335d6a0$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <205101cef911$3bbc9ce0$b335d6a0$@comcast.net> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id rBF4CtL2026836 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jim, Am 14.12.2013 22:12, schrieb hvanesce: > Stefan, > > I will be listening in Arizona. > > I have a location that is free of cultural noise. Arizona is roughly 21dB > from London at 9kHz. A bandwidth/FFT-window equal to the length of your test > is ~ 30uHz/14-hours, and the SNR advantage of this bandwidth over a 1mHz > bandwidth is ~ 15dB. By this reasoning if your signal is detectable in > London at 1mHz, it could be within 5dB of detectability here. > > Do you think this is worth trying? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 85c54099682e8e65d9e25bf804a68673 Subject: Re: LF: RE: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2648 Hi Jim, Am 14.12.2013 22:12, schrieb hvanesce: > Stefan, > > I will be listening in Arizona. > > I have a location that is free of cultural noise. Arizona is roughly 21= dB > from London at 9kHz. A bandwidth/FFT-window equal to the length of your= test > is ~ 30uHz/14-hours, and the SNR advantage of this bandwidth over a 1mH= z > bandwidth is ~ 15dB. By this reasoning if your signal is detectable in > London at 1mHz, it could be within 5dB of detectability here. > > Do you think this is worth trying? It is always worth trying, just for the fascination :-) I think we would=20 need a miracle though. But you/we will get an impression what is=20 possible. It least the QRN is very low these days! > One potentially big problem is that I am > running on the PC (laptop computer) clock. Does the drift in a PC (lapt= op > computer) clock make detection of a weak signal at 30 uHz impossible? Yes, unfortunately. You need a GPS reference signal. There are some GPS=20 modules on ebay, which provide a 10 kHz reference signal. These in=20 combination with Spectrum lab allow to run a 30 uHz window. On my=20 grabber=20 http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html you=20 can see the Alpha RSDN-20 line at 11904.7619 Hz which is stable since=20 several days. Your system needs to be stable like that (so that this=20 stable signal can be displayed like that). More answers later. I have to sleep now. It is 5:12 AM here... 73, Stefan > I have > checked the stability of my laptop computer clock against some other > references, and notice that if I keep the temperature stable, the clock= is > stable, but I have not checked this at 30uHz resolution. > > Whether or not the above idea seems practical, I have another idea: is = there > an easy way to stream raw data [time-domain data, not FFT (frequency do= main) > data] to a disk drive? I externally preamplify and digitize the antenna > signal, and normally connect to SpecLab through the computer USB port; = I > usually digitize at 96ksps. 14 hours (0200-1400 UTC) at 96ksps is ~ 2G= B, > which would fit easily on any of my disk drives. If I capture the raw d= ata > to disk, I can eliminate 20dB of natural noise by post-processing. With= no > cultural noise, and 20dB less natural noise, I should be able to detect= your > signal. Clock drift would necessarily not matter in this example; I cou= ld > inject a weak signal from a stable clock through the antenna, and use t= hat > reference clock signal to compensate for the drift of my laptop clock. > > In any case I will be listening, but if you have thoughts on either of = the > above methods, I will implement them as soon as possible. If I cannot > implement them in time for tomorrow's test, they will be available for = your > next test. > > 73, > > Jim AA5BW > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4f= er > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 12:50 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Cc: Paul Nicholson > Subject: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC > > Hi all, > > Tomorrow the rain probability is just 10% and so i think i can risk to = run a > short VLF experiment on 8970.00500 Hz. I'm using the fixed antenna at > JN49IK00WD. These days, the QRN is very low for quite a long time! > The plan is to run about 500W RF power, or more, depending on the volta= ge > limit of the antenna. And the plan is to start transmitting tonite, aft= er > the experiment with VO1NA, i.e. i'll come on air arround 2 UTC, hopeful= ly. I > will run the test until the late afternoon. First i'm TXing a stable > frequency until 9 UTC, later some DFCW-600, and then maybe some tests i= n > OPDS32. > Suggestions welcome. > BUT it all depends on the WX. If it starts to rain then i have to stop. > Will someone give it a try and watch for me? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > =20