Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp559589igb; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:16:41 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.160.239 with SMTP id xn15mr4732514wib.17.1386987400444; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:16:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ge7si462870wic.56.2013.12.13.18.16.39 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vre14-0007mF-Rq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:27:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vre14-0007m6-ED for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:27:38 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vre12-0004iB-7N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:27:37 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBE1RY4K010680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 02:27:35 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBE1RYPp009838 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 02:27:34 +0100 Message-ID: <52ABB401.7040000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 02:27:29 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: ,<8D0C31F8DA1EC8D-9A4-2C1C@webmail-vd013.sysops.aol.com> <52A60989.5070402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52A63084.20006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52A765CE.8060000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ABAC38.1080901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rBE1RY4K010680 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, I'm stopping my beacon and watch for you the whole time. Maybe you will appear in the QSB, so we can get a first impression over that path. Could you run it a few times longer? As soon as i can read you, i will attempt a QSO. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3194 Hi Joe, I'm stopping my beacon and watch for you the whole time. Maybe you will=20 appear in the QSB, so we can get a first impression over that path.=20 Could you run it a few times longer? As soon as i can read you, i will=20 attempt a QSO. 73, Stefan Am 14.12.2013 02:20, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Hi Stefan, > Been calling you on qrss3 but no reply. Your sigs were variable so I > doubt the path is good at the moment. The exciter is not frequency agi= le > yet -- sorry. This will be a project soon. We can try again tomorrow. > QRSS at 0000-0100. > > 73 and thanks > Joe > > > On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> I just found the latest spot in the 630m DX cluster. You are already=20 >> QRV? Can we make a sked please? >> Can you listen on 472.2 kHz? Or suggest another frequency. I will try=20 >> to listen for you. Or, send some QRSS-3 on 476.180 or so. My grabber=20 >> is running at=20 >> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> PS: There is local QRM on 477.7 here, at least for CW this is not=20 >> odeal for me... >> >> >> Am 10.12.2013 20:40, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> The band is fairly clear. Only a few carriers and WD2XSH stations >>> were heard so far; there is no preferred frequency so just let me kno= w >>> where you will be. 476.17 is fine but there is a carrier 10 Hz below >>> that. I share your doubt we will be able to do CW because my ERP is >>> only about 1.5 watts, but we can certainly try. The plan is to run >>> the CW beacon while there is no CW and QRSS QSO activity, ie: 0300 >>> to 2300 UTC for the 14 and 15th. The TX QRG is 477.70 kHz. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe >>> >> >>