Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp399360igb; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:05:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.188.100 with SMTP id fz4mr9100743wic.57.1386194727111; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:05:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x4si33505345wjf.112.2013.12.04.14.05.26 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VoK85-0006cw-2t for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:37:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VoK84-0006cn-Lh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:37:08 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VoK82-0000kd-Iy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:37:07 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rB4Lb37x025560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:37:03 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rB4Lb36G007560 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <529FA07A.8020700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:36:58 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <529F0C5F.6080600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rB4Lb37x025560 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, With 100W i think there is no chance for CW, at least for me. Maybe EI0CF, he could make it! So then we give it a try in QRSS-3 (i prefer to use DFCW-4). Looking forward to the test. 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC Short-Term 472-479 kHz Experimental License Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3268 Hi Joe, With 100W i think there is no chance for CW, at least for me. Maybe=20 EI0CF, he could make it! So then we give it a try in QRSS-3 (i prefer to use DFCW-4). Looking forward to the test. 73, Stefan Am 04.12.2013 20:11, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Hi Stefan and Group, > > Will be using a class E 100 watts. Could possibly try QRSS3 and > a few CW QSO's if condx are favourable. Hope to see you there! > > 73 > Joe > > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> Thanks for the informations. >> >> Joe, what will be your TX system? Is there also a chance for a CW=20 >> sked? Or QRSS-3, if the conds are poor? The best time will be during=20 >> your local sunset, i assume. >> I will be there! Stations from the UK or PA will have much better=20 >> chances though. >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> Am 03.12.2013 21:58, schrieb F4DTL@aol.com: >>> *Industry Canada* has issued an=20 >>> experimental radio license to the *Marconi Radio Club of=20 >>> Newfoundland* =20 >>> (VO1MRC). Experimental station VX9MRC has been endorsed to conduct=20 >>> transmissions on 472-479 kHz for just two days =E2=80=94 December 14 = and 15=20 >>> =E2=80=94 to call attention to the potential new Amateur Radio band t= here=20 >>> and to the role ham radio plays in emergency communication. >>> >>> =E2=80=9CA special message from our mayor will be sent on CW on 478 k= Hz as a=20 >>> beacon transmission on these days,=E2=80=9D said Joe Craig, VO1NA, a=20 >>> low-frequency enthusiast. =E2=80=9CThose receiving the message are in= vited=20 >>> to forward it to their respective municipal representative.=E2=80=9D >>> >>> ARRL >>> >>