Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp146886igb; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 03:50:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.36.105 with SMTP id p9mr17508423wij.58.1385985036669; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 03:50:36 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fv3si29117249wjb.114.2013.12.02.03.50.36 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 03:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VnRWf-0000eC-LJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:18:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VnRWf-0000e3-1n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:18:53 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VnRWc-0003z3-LI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:18:51 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB2BInZU029730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:18:49 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rB2BImFq024669 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <529C6C93.4000605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:18:43 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Peter, Probably your detection on 8969.996 was local QRM since the line appeared and disappeared with the QRM of your battery charger. See the image... 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 46d617994b9fba079dc3ad7182acba54 Subject: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000008020803000603090207" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2134 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000008020803000603090207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Peter, Probably your detection on 8969.996 was local QRM since the line appeared and disappeared with the QRM of your battery charger. See the image... 73, Stefan Am 01.12.2013 23:44, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: > In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to > 8970,022 Hz. > Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ? > Peter, PA1SDB > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM > *Subject:* Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. > > Hi Peter, > may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some > trouble with it. > GL > Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hello Uwe, > I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz > transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on > 8970,022 Hz ? > There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason > is something here localy ????? > I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) > front of that bright part befor A > I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared > to... > Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz. > Wondering why the signal befor mark *A *was better in relation to > *B** * > Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ? > Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB > --------------000008020803000603090207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id rB2BInZU029730 Hi Peter,

Probably your detection on 8969.996 was local QRM since the line appeared and disappeared with the QRM of your battery charger. See the image...

73, Stefan

Am 01.12.2013 23:44, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz.
Is it possible to=A0make a sweep from xx to xx ?
=A0
Peter, PA1SDB
=A0
=A0
=A0
=A0
----- Original Message -----
From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g
Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hello Uwe,
I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that=A08969,996 Hz transmission=A0Saturday=A0(A) a= nd this Sunday transmission=A0(B) on 8970,022 Hz ?
=A0
There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps=A0the reason is something here localy ?????
=A0
I did start the PC,=A0and connected a=A0car battery loader at=A0(18h00) front of that bright part befor A
I did diconnect the loader (05h33)=A0at A and the signal dissapared to...
Later on the signal became=A0bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz.
=A0
Wondering why the signal=A0befor mark A was better in relation to = B=A0
=A0
Was it you on 8969,996 Hz = ?
=A0
3D""=A0
=A0
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
=A0
=A0
=A0
--------------000008020803000603090207--