Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp42808igb; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.173.163 with SMTP id bl3mr48084869wjc.10.1385854981187; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l10si16418254wiw.46.2013.11.30.15.43.00 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VmtPR-0006uz-6q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 22:53:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VmtPQ-0006uq-NY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 22:53:08 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VmtPO-0001vG-OJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 22:53:07 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rAUMr5Xl006328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:53:06 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rAUMr5Io029574 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:53:05 +0100 Message-ID: <529A6C4B.30908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:52:59 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Uwe, Am 30.11.2013 23:40, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: > Hi Stefan and Eddie, > > the QRG is 8970.022Hz, still. > Stefan, I used SecLab for qrg generation months ago. would be OK today > too. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 567a11ac6cfe1e88f3054745c06178fe Subject: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090801060804000301080308" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2138 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090801060804000301080308 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rAUMr5Xl006328 Hi Uwe, Am 30.11.2013 23:40, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: > Hi Stefan and Eddie, > > the QRG is 8970.022Hz, still. > Stefan, I used SecLab for qrg generation months ago. would be OK today=20 > too. > but I dont like the PC beeing switched on for hours. Why? Due to the power consumption? :-) SpecLab would allow you to send some DFCW which gives a better ID. Just=20 an idea... 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: My VLF grabber PC is running since 2010, 24/365, maybe it is shut=20 down for less than 1 hours per year :-) (same for the LF PC and the LF=20 TX PC).. > > GL > Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv. > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= - > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Gesendet: 30.11.2013 22:21 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= - > > Hello Uwe, > > No chance to convince you to try to use SpecLab for the frequency=20 > generation? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 30.11.2013 18:00, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: >> Hi Henny and Peter, >> tks for the roports. >> >> at 1637utc I switched the TX on. due to a local heros =93football play= =94=20 >> I was somewhat late. >> >> the qrg generator isn=92t 100% OK. the counter shows some uHz qrh.it i= s=20 >> a homebrew ZL1BPU exciter. changing the AVRmicro and connecting an=20 >> other 10MHz qrg normal didn=92t solve the problem. >> >> we will see. >> >> the TX will be switched on for some hours. >> >> GL >> >> Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv >> >> --------------090801060804000301080308 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rAUMr5Xl006328 Hi Uwe,

Am 30.11.2013 23:40, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de:
rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 30.11.2013 22:21
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.


Hello Uwe,

No chance to convince you to try to use SpecLab for the frequency generation?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 30.11.2013 18:00, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: