Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp99577igc; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 02:46:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.78.141 with SMTP id b13mr13519686wjx.32.1387190793280; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 02:46:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c9si4756611wjs.146.2013.12.16.02.46.32 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 02:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VsVHy-0006bt-Oi for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:20:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VsVHy-0006bk-7P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:20:38 +0000 Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.80]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVHw-0002Cn-5y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:20:37 +0000 Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2ALa1n0011HpZEsA8ALaQ7; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:20:34 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.53]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2ALC1n00A19Y0ty8aALJRq; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:20:28 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ADD9C8.2000700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002c01cef9d1$8611d600$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <52AE0E53.60506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52AE2D2B.6010406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <52AE2D2B.6010406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 03:20:03 -0700 Message-ID: <217601cefa48$6c3476d0$449d6470$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQDv1GJXB3c+P3UmA4Ys+hWTxrTAUQFF9ILZAeQ9LMoBcmoJzQIBNnf+A1HMKSgBiTgcPwGYFOFxAjtZBtECdi5FiwE4iB5vAnABzgKbaYTWsA== Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387189234; bh=HSf46eNpMqG54QRqyPM/Xs5/DBPyJuqOonD+ZsfD78Y=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=D2YttkPyA6E6rE6Qgc2IDWYNhpGwv7jLYL9lklkPLu4gbM/eXGwH6YLZeKe3WZHXe SNg4M/3Z0HLgCC/Q1uYDxx5AzvK5UZ21eAEHkrz6uW0q0xO3+uX/RIDaFI9FnH9j3K xBwKzou6LxcjtbqmhotbNiPtHP71eitX7lYek3BUOf19ZJsZZAv9oVH1ga1Hw6aEjL 0TekF79uva/i/G6F8bRRWOmRmCSXO5lMoMQbA6Dls9RfkMenP7RLUx41BY0bR4X35p lfGteSHXvq1YpjuMw3MMKZ9PmepX/FcuKITrigaaciQKazPb43i+G7Z92+QylKT5Pe +NdYxyKmaUDUg== X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, I did not capture raw A/D data during your 8970.005 transmission yesterday, but I have figured out how to do so and will be ready next time. Based on SNR yesterday at Todmorden and virtually no cultural noise here, it might be possible to extract your signal here with some post-processing of natural noise. Do you have a guess or an estimate of ERP for yesterday's test? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: RE: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1471 Stefan, I did not capture raw A/D data during your 8970.005 transmission = yesterday, but I have figured out how to do so and will be ready next = time. Based on SNR yesterday at Todmorden and virtually no cultural = noise here, it might be possible to extract your signal here with some = post-processing of natural noise. Do you have a guess or an estimate of = ERP for yesterday's test? 73, Jim AA5BW =20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 3:29 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Hi Laurence, Am 15.12.2013 22:27, schrieb Laurence KL7 L: > Is this the same coil as used for the kites stefan? > =20 Yes, it is. 73, Stefan