Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp134557igb; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 01:05:39 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.39.140 with SMTP id p12mr17072037wik.12.1385975138180; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 01:05:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kb10si28889401wjc.152.2013.12.02.01.05.36 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 01:05:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VnOyo-0005tG-3E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:35:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VnOyn-0005t7-B2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:35:45 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VnOyk-0002h2-SO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:35:44 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews30.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.196]) by cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:35:41 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.5]) by cpsps-ews30.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:35:41 +0100 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:35:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1DC9382DB6D14DC498BF021228908FEE@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <529BBDBA.1060706@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <529BBDBA.1060706@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:35:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2013 08:35:41.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C1AAB60:01CEEF39] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eddie, It must be something local then. It will not be easy to find that source that produces such a stable signal here in my home. Most signal generators and transmitters do drift here a lot :-) Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.9 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 5e4f7dbaa4e67ba4f35166ebb5a870be Subject: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_19FB_01CEEF39.7BB18950" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2141 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_19FB_01CEEF39.7BB18950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eddie, It must be something local then. It will not be easy to find that source that produces such a stable signal here in my home. Most signal generators and transmitters do drift here a lot :-) Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: g3zjo To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:52 PM Subject: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. On 01/12/2013 22:44, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: In my oppinion the signal was buch better on 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz. Is it possible to make a sweep from xx to xx ? Peter, PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb Wait a minute I was receiving at that time and saw absolutely nothing, does that not point to a local source to Peter. I did post a message to ask where it originated as I detected nothing. Eddie G3ZJO ----- Original Message ----- From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 10:39 PM Subject: Re: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. Hi Peter, may be the generator was out of control. as told here I had some trouble with it. GL Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 01.12.2013 21:51 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello Uwe, I'm wondering what was/is the difference between that 8969,996 Hz transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday transmission (B) on 8970,022 Hz ? There where some unstabillity's here localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy ????? I did start the PC, and connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that bright part befor A I did diconnect the loader (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to... Later on the signal became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz. Wondering why the signal befor mark A was better in relation to B Was it you on 8969,996 Hz ? Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB ------=_NextPart_000_19FB_01CEEF39.7BB18950 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Eddie,
It must be something local then.
It will not be easy to find that source that = produces=20 such a stable signal here in my home.
Most signal generators and transmitters=20 do drift here a lot :-)
 
Peter PA1SDB
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 g3zjo=20
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 = 10:52=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: A 8970Hz = Report from The=20 Netherlands.

On 01/12/2013 22:44, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:=20
In my oppinion the signal was buch better = on=20 8969,996 in relation to 8970,022 Hz.
Is it possible to make a sweep from = xx to xx=20 ?
 
Peter, PA1SDB
 
=
Wait=20 a minute I was receiving at that time and saw absolutely nothing, does = that=20 not point to a local source to Peter. I did post a message to ask = where it=20 originated as I detected nothing.

Eddie G3ZJO
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Sunday, December 01, = 2013 10:39=20 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: A = 8970Hz Report=20 from The Netherlands.

Hi=20 Peter,
may be the generator was out of control. as told here I = had some=20 trouble with it.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx jo43sv
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet:=20 01.12.2013 21:51
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: = Re:=20 LF: A 8970Hz Report from The Netherlands.

Hello Uwe,
I'm wondering what = was/is the=20 difference between that 8969,996 Hz=20 transmission Saturday (A) and this Sunday = transmission (B)=20 on 8970,022 Hz ?
 
There where some = unstabillity's=20 here localy, so perhaps the reason is something here localy=20 ?????
 
I did start the = PC, and=20 connected a car battery loader at (18h00) front of that = bright=20 part befor A
I did diconnect the = loader=20 (05h33) at A and the signal dissapared to...
Later on the signal=20 became bright and clear at 8970,022 Hz.
 
Wondering why the=20 signal befor mark A was better in relation = to=20 B 
 
Was it you on 8969,996 = Hz=20 ?
 
3D"" 
 
Best 73's, Peter=20 PA1SDB
 
 
 

------=_NextPart_000_19FB_01CEEF39.7BB18950--