Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp224769igc; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:07:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.89.97 with SMTP id bn1mr12661958wjb.18.1387670841851; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:07:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u8si5279410wiy.64.2013.12.21.16.07.21 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:07:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VuVyb-0006sH-Nw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 23:28:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VuVyb-0006s8-6Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 23:28:57 +0000 Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VuVyY-00072W-Hl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 23:28:56 +0000 Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 4PU11n0031HpZEsADPUsrZ; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 23:28:52 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.180.93]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 4PUW1n00K21JJ068aPUcQ1; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 23:28:47 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: <52B190D4.7070307@psk31.plus.com> <52B1C52E.3050707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <52B1C52E.3050707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:28:28 -0700 Message-ID: <012901cefea4$63f31610$2bd94230$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIxGS/PBu/qqC8AuaBg5i9+xy9Z8gHD33oqmYzz6IA= Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387668532; bh=tDwIatXKgSTrH+3/JG9IdC8MDmsu8tJMH8bMK4wy+LY=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=ObBhmz3VlkFtZmfqtN1pyMoGxZC93Ag4A0Cj2l1ILJt3CWtUNgQkUAb2ysnUqR7cM i5tFOGOBmRVm9heysD2WdOnc8nNDVC9NwzIucEvhsNUJ7WV8ChHBpyVJB30EQqPXrm B8ehzx6Dw2IYq4EvTHm5Pz/6OHqIFR82SAKzase5wwIYfWpneL5qXWkKqSBZWlCEix pVAlA/VBXkRwNzoHmSL2leTDwVQ3yntobogFTg9lR+8m6kRnN3aWgIOT7afgtIo0NH M3r/lhtO5fHtNakDbfNVANcUsqpVzYctTM/Gg+Mv59akHIivLhJxuZN6DqCceISKBM SYGTn7NTQOhFg== X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I anyone planning 8.9kHz tests in the near future? I'll have SpecLab running in the VLF from now on except for upgrades. What is the best frequency range to monitor? I have been planning to use 47uHz bandwidth. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.27.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: RE: LF: 8.9KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1464 I anyone planning 8.9kHz tests in the near future? I'll have SpecLab = running in the VLF from now on except for upgrades. What is the best frequency = range to monitor? I have been planning to use 47uHz bandwidth. 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:54 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz Hi Eddie, Yes, maybe this weekend, if the WX permits. I just made some = optimisations to the PA und will do more changes to the system. I will announce it one day in advance or so. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.12.2013 13:11, schrieb g3zjo: > Hi All > > Are there any more 8.9KHz tests planned for the near future. I missed=20 > Stefan's last. > > I look forward to any that come up, plenty of warning appreciated = please. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO