Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp48005igb; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.85.42 with SMTP id e10mr7350305wiz.1.1383442441282; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hu4si5430306wjb.92.2013.11.02.18.34.00 for ; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vcm3A-0006pL-7i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:00:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vcm39-0006pC-MT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:00:19 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vcm37-0007gV-Ag for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:00:18 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id rA310Ewg031594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:30:14 -0230 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:30:14 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <3A50C8B9F9F24AB3B5D6EFABF860D39F@White> Message-ID: References: <002101ced80e$b5cc2600$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <3A50C8B9F9F24AB3B5D6EFABF860D39F@White> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus, That was brilliant, but alas it had nothing to do with time. Amidst pangs of guilt for the deception, I confess to toggling TX antennas. It seems the vertical radiates better to the west than the wire but the wire is sometimes better at lobbing photons across the pond. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 32d4aaaf019758ff5a0d8e92eec683e6 Subject: Re: LF: early T/A Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3397 Markus, That was brilliant, but alas it had nothing to do with time. Amidst pangs of guilt for the deception, I confess to toggling TX antennas. It seems the vertical radiates better to the west than the wire but the wire is sometimes better at lobbing photons across the pond. I'll be very happy to buy you a pint for your enlightening reply! 73 Joe VO1NA On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Markus Vester wrote: > Joe, > > I'll have a go at the beer. But having defined the timing myself that's probably unfair ;-) > > Jay's SpecLab / opds starts a new 35 minute FFT slot very 10 minutes. You are apparently repeating your sequence every 35 minutes, with a two minute gap between 33 minute transmissions. So there are two alternating positions relative to the receive raster, and the gap may hit either in 3 or 4 RX slots. The whole pattern will repeat after 70 minutes (7 vertical pixels). This is also apparent in the overlap percentage column which has toggled between eg. 86% and 100% > > Best 73, > Markus > > > From: jcraig@mun.ca > Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 12:58 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: early T/A > > > Thanks Markus and all who sent reports. > > The TX has been on since 2159 1 Nov utc. Jay has captured signals during > the daytime. A free pint for the first one who can explain the apparent > periodicity at 137.555 kHz in Jay's spectra. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA > > > On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, Markus Vester wrote: > >> ...and Joe's been coming in here since 18:57 ;-) >> http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/opds.htm >> >> Good luck to all, >> 73, Markus (DF6NM) >> >> >> From: jrusgrove@comcast.net >> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 10:01 PM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: LF: early T/A >> >> >> Stefan making the trip on OPDS32 at 2024Z ... >> >> http://www.w1vd.com/OPDSgrabber.html >> >> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 >> >> > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php