Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <BLU180-W767D8363DD5F82145A73BFACFE0@phx.gbl>
From: Bob Raide <rjraide@hotmail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:43:18 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <52823893.7000902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <ojm4wh1au5orhc5x6ylpj0lu.1384186716632@email.android.com>
 <52817DCA.1050205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<52823893.7000902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_4d3a3c50-d1c3-4c97-a2a6-4a36d7abf947_"
Subject: RE: LF: MF propagation
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

--_4d3a3c50-d1c3-4c97-a2a6-4a36d7abf947_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan=2C et all...
4000 meters was dead last night so I tried 630.  Strange that only one deco=
de on the Continent [France].  All the other decodes were UK stations even =
though many Euro stations monitoring.  Also=2C no West Coast but just shy o=
f West Coast-strong signals to mid-west and close in-strange selective prop=
agation=2C indeed-Bob=2C WE2XGR/6 [WSPR 2-474.2 dial]
=20
> Date: Tue=2C 12 Nov 2013 15:17:55 +0100
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: MF propagation
>=20
> MF=2C
>=20
> I just see that there was a lot of TA DX last night=2C however local=20
> signals in a range of 300 km were very poor! Could it have to do with =20
> the elevation angle of the radiated signal=2C so that a flat angle result=
s=20
> in less attenuation? Less number of hops=2C that's clear but maybe not=20
> only that..
> DST levels were in the range of -40...-50 nT but that seems not to be=20
> problematic for 630m.
>=20
> Does someone know more?
>=20
> 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
>=20
 		 	   		  =

--_4d3a3c50-d1c3-4c97-a2a6-4a36d7abf947_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>Stefan=2C et all...<BR>4000 mete=
rs was dead last night so I tried 630.&nbsp=3B Strange that&nbsp=3Bonly one=
 decode on the Continent [France].&nbsp=3B All the other decodes were UK st=
ations even though many Euro stations monitoring.&nbsp=3B Also=2C no West C=
oast but just shy of West Coast-strong signals to mid-west and close in-str=
ange selective propagation=2C indeed-Bob=2C WE2XGR/6 [WSPR 2-474.2 dial]<br=
>&nbsp=3B<BR><div>&gt=3B Date: Tue=2C 12 Nov 2013 15:17:55 +0100<br>&gt=3B =
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de<br>&gt=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@bla=
cksheep.org<br>&gt=3B Subject: LF: MF propagation<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B MF=
=2C<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B I just see that there was a lot of TA DX last nigh=
t=2C however local <br>&gt=3B signals in a range of 300 km were very poor! =
Could it have to do with  <br>&gt=3B the elevation angle of the radiated si=
gnal=2C so that a flat angle results <br>&gt=3B in less attenuation? Less n=
umber of hops=2C that's clear but maybe not <br>&gt=3B only that..<br>&gt=
=3B DST levels were in the range of -40...-50 nT but that seems not to be <=
br>&gt=3B problematic for 630m.<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B Does someone know more=
?<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC<br>&gt=3B <br></div> 		 	   		  <=
/div></body>
</html>=

--_4d3a3c50-d1c3-4c97-a2a6-4a36d7abf947_--