Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp335167igb; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:35:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.188.164 with SMTP id gb4mr19325683wic.52.1383708919557; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jr6si10235199wjc.99.2013.11.05.19.35.19 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VdtJx-0002g1-QV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:58:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VdtJx-0002fs-8R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:58:17 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VdtJv-0005R7-7E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:58:16 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W74 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:58:14 -0800 X-TMN: [VHO3X5YHJ59qt64DhbLqIh17+A+Qc5L0] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:58:13 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> References: ,<07b801ceda96$deca1be0$9c5e53a0$@comcast.net> ,<07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2013 02:58:14.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[092B5070:01CEDA9C] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Guess that would be a question for Hartmut in the morning-Bob I am going to change to 474.2 dial freq WSPR2 and see if can do anything T/A-Bob From: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600 Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 9384a33da03ada6d15116c61d7d30153 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_9c6ef161-9315-4ab5-a0ed-146bd74d2b6a_" Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_60_70, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1594 --_9c6ef161-9315-4ab5-a0ed-146bd74d2b6a_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guess that would be a question for Hartmut in the morning-Bob I am going to change to 474.2 dial freq WSPR2 and see if can do anything T/= A-Bob =20 From: hvanesce@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue=2C 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600 Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Yes Bob=2C I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultu= ral noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling w= ave. But your comment had me reconsidering=3B and I then wondered if the n= oise burst could be correlated with the event that John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) jus= t reported (thanks John). Bob=2C the time scale on Hartmut=92s grabber plot= is skewed at 2200 (in the image generated at 0215). Is that skew something= that the plotter does to move the timestamp away from the date stamp? In o= ther words=2C is the noise burst in Hartmut=92s plot after 2212=2C i.e. coi= ncident with the event that John reported? 73=2C Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsg= b_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Be= half Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday=2C November 5=2C 2013 8:33 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Jim=3B Did you look at Hartmut's grabber? Just before I started transmitting there are these big blotches that look l= ike noise of some kind. From: hvanesce@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue=2C 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600 Subject: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good...Bob=2C This is puzzling=3B it d= oesn=92t seem to be attributable to any of the usual suspects =2C including= Dst indices=2C terminator=2C equipment. Atypical in many ways from histori= cal trends of your signal. Watching with interest! 73=2C Jim AA5BW From: o= wner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday=2C November 5=2C 2013 7:31 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good... Looked like all of a sudden at aro= und 2350 my transmitter blew up! But transmitter still at full smoke just = no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... = --_9c6ef161-9315-4ab5-a0ed-146bd74d2b6a_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Guess that would be a question f= or Hartmut in the morning-Bob
I am going to change to 474.2 dial freq WS= PR2 and see if can do anything T/A-Bob
 =3B

From: hvanesce@comcast.net
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
D= ate: Tue=2C 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600
Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was l= ooking good...

Yes Bob=2C

 =3B

<= span style=3D'color: rgb(31=2C 73=2C 125)=3B font-family: "Calibri"=2C"sans= -serif"=3B font-size: 11pt=3B'>I originally attributed that noise burst aro= und (2200?) to cultural noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad= to be a traveling wave.  =3BBut your comment had me reconsidering=3B a= nd I then wondered if the noise burst could be correlated with the event th= at John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John).

 =3B

Bob=2C the time scale on = Hartmut=92s grabber plot is skewed at 2200 (in the image generated at 0215)= . Is that skew something that the plotter does to move the timestamp away f= rom the date stamp? In other words=2C is the noise burst in Hartmut=92s plo= t after 2212=2C i.e. coincident with the event that John reported?

 =3B=

73=2C<= /p>

 =3B

Jim AA5BW<= /span>

 = =3B

&n= bsp=3B

<= span style=3D'font-family: "Tahoma"=2C"sans-serif"=3B font-size: 10pt=3B'>F= rom: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_gr= oup@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: Tuesday= =2C November 5=2C 2013 8:33 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.orgSubject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good...

<= /div>

 =3B

<= span style=3D'font-family: "Calibri"=2C"sans-serif"=3B'>Jim=3B
Did you l= ook at Hartmut's grabber?
Just before I started transmitting there are t= hese big blotches that look like noise of some kind.
 =3B

=

<= p class=3D"ecxMsoNormal">From: hvanesce@comcast.net
To:
rsgb_lf_group@bla= cksheep.org
Date: Tue=2C 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600
Subject: LF: R= E: 74.5495 was looking good...

Bob=2C

 =3B

This is puzzling=3B it doesn=92t seem to be attributable to any of= the usual suspects =2C including Dst indices=2C terminator=2C equipment.

 =3B

Atypical in many ways from h= istorical trends of your signal.

 =3B

Watching with interest!

 =3B

73=2C<= /span>

 = =3B<= /p>

Jim AA5BW

 =3B

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On= Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: Tuesday=2C November 5=2C 2013 7:31= PM
To: rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good...<= /span>

<= /div>

 =3B

Looked like all of a su= dden at around 2350 my transmitter blew up! =3B But transmitter still a= t full smoke just =3Bno propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4...

= --_9c6ef161-9315-4ab5-a0ed-146bd74d2b6a_--