Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp207317igb; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:27:59 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.99.73 with SMTP id eo9mr16573985wib.50.1384774079174; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:27:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dj3si3627654wib.10.2013.11.18.03.27.58 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 03:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ViMYC-0000Mf-4q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:59:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ViMYB-0000MW-MU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:59:27 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ViMY9-0006CP-EK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:59:26 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rAIAxO3a018752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:59:24 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rAIAxNp2004837 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:59:23 +0100 Message-ID: <5289F307.7050809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:59:19 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7999425CD9D44F318DA5D8EF87586DB4@White> <5287F539.1070107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <22FB893331D04C0AA4203527A27E527B@White> <72E5AADE740A475DA38C5E3A00A6AAC9@White> <841DB258581548699A86130F860DF165@White> In-Reply-To: <841DB258581548699A86130F860DF165@White> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, Thanks for the service. Last night i tried again but there is no chance. It appears that the DCF39 SNR is much lower than expected over that distance. Are you sure this is due to the hill on the path to DCF? Do you think you can see the band noise / have the maximum sensitivity? I assume there could be at least 10 dB, rather 20 dB to gain. How does the diurnal wideband spectrum look there? Periodic QRM? And do you use the same equipment as in India last year? [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0cdfd8d5ce44f1724c623c4ac9f44df6 Subject: Re: LF: Lanzarote Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060809090201020301050001" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2409 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060809090201020301050001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus, Thanks for the service. Last night i tried again but there is no chance. It appears that the DCF39 SNR is much lower than expected over that distance. Are you sure this is due to the hill on the path to DCF? Do you think you can see the band noise / have the maximum sensitivity? I assume there could be at least 10 dB, rather 20 dB to gain. How does the diurnal wideband spectrum look there? Periodic QRM? And do you use the same equipment as in India last year? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.11.2013 10:39, schrieb Markus Vester: > Just went out and noticed that the wind had taken down the antenna > wire - hence the weak signals. > 73, Markus > > *From:* Markus Vester > *Sent:* Monday, November 18, 2013 10:12 AM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Lanzarote > > No signals were captured here in the Eu / TA / WSPR-15 slots last night. > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/plot.jpg shows DCF39 and > HGA22 about 10 dB down on the night before. > Best 73, > Markus (EA8/DF6NM) > --------------060809090201020301050001 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus,

Thanks for the service.
Last night i tried again but there is no chance. It appears that the DCF39 SNR is much lower than expected over that distance. Are you sure this is due to the hill on the path to DCF?
Do you think you can see the band noise / have the maximum sensitivity? I assume there could be at least 10 dB, rather 20 dB to gain. How does the diurnal wideband spectrum look there? Periodic QRM?
And do you use the same equipment as in India last year?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 18.11.2013 10:39, schrieb Markus Vester:
Just went out and noticed that the wind had taken down the antenna wire - hence the weak signals.
 
73, Markus

Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Lanzarote

No signals were captured here in the Eu / TA / WSPR-15 slots last night.
http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/plot.jpg shows DCF39 and HGA22 about 10 dB down on the night before.
 
Best 73,
Markus (EA8/DF6NM)

--------------060809090201020301050001--