Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp140216igb; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:54:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.15.94.201 with SMTP id bb49mr18540511eeb.23.1383936891517; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:54:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k2si8186465eey.122.2013.11.08.10.54.50 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VerBi-0008Fi-1B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:53:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VerBh-0008FZ-Cl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:53:45 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VerBf-0002OW-LQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:53:44 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA8Irgp7019960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:53:43 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rA8IrgWM024711 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:53:42 +0100 Message-ID: <527D3331.7080109@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 19:53:37 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC908D5@ICTS-S-MBX2.luna.kuleuven.be>,<527CEE11.8070509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC98037@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <527D0CCB.6090208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <527D300A.7000909@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <527D300A.7000909@aol.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Oh yes, or, a phase meter (M0BMU) and a battery operated variometer motor. Without an additional cable to the shack. Then the SWR meter in the shack confirms that everything is fine. 73, Stefan Am 08.11.2013 19:40, schrieb pat: > Hi All, > > A suggestion: battery operated tuning device at antenna end and > "wireless" link back to shack. Wireless can operate at a > non-interfering frequncy (HF/VHF/UHF/Optical). > > 73 > > > > > > > On 08/11/13 16:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Hi Rik, >> >> Am 08.11.2013 16:06, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >>> >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> remote tuning of the loading should be done by optimizing SWR (at >>> the TX), not for maximum RF current. >>> >>> If one keeps that in mind there is no problem. >>> >> ...which is in agreement with what i said. >> But once you have matched your antenna to 50 Ohm on resonance and you >> can only vary the reactive part of the antennas impedance (after >> doing QSY), then you will get the maximum antenna current at best SWR >> (assuming that Rrad+Rloss is constant which is not to far from reality). >> >>> I am not sure if I will keep the remote variometer >>> tuning. It needs some extra wires to the loading coil and >>> I am not sure how long the small DC >>> motor will function properly with all the rain and frost coming up. >>> >> Here it holds since more than 2 years for LF now.. >> >> 73, Stefan >> > > > -- > 73 de pat g4gvw > es gd dx > qth nr Felixstowe > East Coast UK [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b2000330e4064ca60a9f57e731b892da Subject: Re: LF: remote antenna tuning Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050505020409030508020607" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3438 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050505020409030508020607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id rA8Irgp7019960 Oh yes, or, a phase meter (M0BMU) and a battery operated variometer=20 motor. Without an additional cable to the shack. Then the SWR meter in=20 the shack confirms that everything is fine. 73, Stefan Am 08.11.2013 19:40, schrieb pat: > Hi All, > > A suggestion: battery operated tuning device at antenna end and=20 > "wireless" link back to shack. Wireless can operate at a=20 > non-interfering frequncy (HF/VHF/UHF/Optical). > > 73 > > > > > > > On 08/11/13 16:09, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> Hi Rik, >> >> Am 08.11.2013 16:06, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >>> >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> remote tuning of the loading should be done by optimizing SWR (at=20 >>> the TX), not for maximum RF current. >>> >>> If one keeps that in mind there is no problem. >>> >> ...which is in agreement with what i said. >> But once you have matched your antenna to 50 Ohm on resonance and you=20 >> can only vary the reactive part of the antennas impedance (after=20 >> doing QSY), then you will get the maximum antenna current at best SWR=20 >> (assuming that Rrad+Rloss is constant which is not to far from reality= ). >> >>> I am not sure if I will keep the remote variometer=20 >>> tuning. It needs some extra wires to the loading coil and=20 >>> I am not sure how long the small DC=20 >>> motor will function properly with all the rain and frost coming up. >>> >> Here it holds since more than 2 years for LF now.. >> >> 73, Stefan >> > > > --=20 > 73 de pat g4gvw > es gd dx > qth nr Felixstowe > East Coast UK --------------050505020409030508020607 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Oh yes, or, a phase meter (M0BMU) and a battery operated variometer motor. Without an additional cable to the shack. Then the SWR meter in the shack confirms that everything is fine.

73, Stefan

Am 08.11.2013 19:40, schrieb pat:
Hi All,

A suggestion: battery operated tuning device at antenna end and "wireless" link back to shack. Wireless can operate at a non-interfering frequncy (HF/VHF/UHF/Optical).

73






On 08/11/13 16:09, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Hi Rik,

Am 08.11.2013 16:06, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

Hi Stefan,

 

remote tuning of the loading should be done by optimizing SWR (at the TX), not for maximum RF current.

If one keeps that in mind there is no problem.

...which is in agreement with what i said.
But once you have matched your antenna to 50 Ohm on resonance and you can only vary the reactive part of the antennas impedance (after doing QSY), then you will get the maximum antenna current at best SWR (assuming that Rrad+Rloss is constant which is not to far from reality).

I am not sure if I will keep the remote variometer tuning. It needs some extra wires to the loading coil and I am not sure how long the small DC motor will function properly with all the rain and frost coming up.

Here it holds since more than 2 years for LF now..

73, Stefan



-- 
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK
--------------050505020409030508020607--