Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp408418igb; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:12:44 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.126.103 with SMTP id mx7mr4232667wib.39.1383775964157; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:12:44 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ea10si4919899wib.63.2013.11.06.14.12.43 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VeAy8-0001d0-Pd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:48:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VeAy8-0001cr-Bs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:48:56 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VeAy6-0001jM-GJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:48:55 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rA6Lmq6B001848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:48:53 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rA6LmrEI015181 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: <527AB93F.4020306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:48:47 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <527AAB99.5080905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Lubos, Oh, yes, looks quite equal. But you have much less QRM, the best VLF grabber available! 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 20fb97b64762a0bd80c12a4b2f6724b0 Subject: Re: LF: SID 14 UTC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030506080907030603090704" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2923 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030506080907030603090704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Lubos, Oh, yes, looks quite equal. But you have much less QRM, the best VLF grabber available! 73, Stefan Am 06.11.2013 22:41, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: > Hello Stefan! > The same picture on my VLF grabber (www.ok2bvg/vlfgrabber). M4 solar > flare. > > Lubos, OK2BVG > > ******************************************************************* > > > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:50:33 +0100 > > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Subject: LF: SID 14 UTC > > > > Hello VLF, > > > > Just checked if my VLF grabber is still running. It is, > > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html > > And there i saw a well visible SID arround 14 UTC. Still visible on the > > lowest image on the site. > > Does someone have more deteils? > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > --------------030506080907030603090704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Lubos,

Oh, yes, looks quite equal. But you have much less QRM, the best VLF grabber available!

73, Stefan

Am 06.11.2013 22:41, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello Stefan!
The same picture on my VLF grabber (www.ok2bvg/vlfgrabber). M4 solar flare.

Lubos, OK2BVG

*******************************************************************

> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 21:50:33 +0100
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: SID 14 UTC
>
> Hello VLF,
>
> Just checked if my VLF grabber is still running. It is,
> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html
> And there i saw a well visible SID arround 14 UTC. Still visible on the
> lowest image on the site.
> Does someone have more deteils?
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
--------------030506080907030603090704--