Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp347773igb; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:20:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.189.80 with SMTP id gg16mr20118718wic.32.1383726016132; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:20:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ic3si9239698wjb.72.2013.11.06.00.20.15 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:20:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VdxdP-0003PD-5F for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:34:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VdxdO-0003P2-B8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:34:38 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VdxdM-0006JS-R2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:34:37 +0000 Received: from [192.168.103.46] ([84.133.187.172]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lugbo-1VmWL52LyK-00zoHf for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:34:35 +0100 Message-ID: <5279F0F6.6020808@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:34:14 +0100 From: Hartmut Wolff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: ,<07b801ceda96$deca1be0$9c5e53a0$@comcast.net> <07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qO9dTbwEEhyY9/Tn6iH2n0/GFE9Luc+F2/A+lDPt/j9AYm0qio/ d+NO5TZx4cob9Io7txwoKqEtIdEYiqa0fJJ2Q1fXV2SPINIqfR4E0NxL6XC9eUnldMQ82/8 iX19LRBQVSAPkSJex6qbSd1yKqbMcEftzjVwPYgqIG1WKHX73TEUUBjvHAuc5jVuP3cGGyz 04cS1UMaxSoAwEwv7Y+og== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jim, Bob and LF, Am 06.11.2013 03:51, schrieb hvanesce: > I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural > noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling > wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered if the > noise burst could be correlated with the event that John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) > just reported (thanks John). [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (h-wolff[at]gmx.de) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: Re: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2637 Jim, Bob and LF, Am 06.11.2013 03:51, schrieb hvanesce: > I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural > noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling > wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered if the > noise burst could be correlated with the event that John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) > just reported (thanks John). The noise was produced by the local weather: heavy rain and wind 73 Hartmut