Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp335164igb; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:35:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.11.38 with SMTP id n6mr676722wjb.25.1383708918913; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p8si10228139wjz.132.2013.11.05.19.35.18 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VdtDg-0002ZV-VL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:51:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VdtDg-0002ZM-78 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:51:48 +0000 Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.17]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VdtDc-0005OQ-T4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:51:47 +0000 Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m2lq1m0060mlR8UAA2rial; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:51:42 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.147.71.189]) by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m2rL1m00R451mrJ8X2rSF0; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:51:37 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: ,<07b801ceda96$deca1be0$9c5e53a0$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:51:12 -0600 Message-ID: <07db01ceda9b$17f8a400$47e9ec00$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQI6ma873u+i9oIZdmDldQaARxRDZQJ5dehvAb3wuJCZHkTD8A== Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1383706302; bh=3Ajq4yryRfRbc5AHWe+FU+rN4Izz/NUQH6lmgDEakxc=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=XW+5ui1H3uJQswhXJh/ls7ONax31JN7vSAxIksLMYPpJGpFncAAHR7nbPWAlxzI8Q LZTM36cdyT71GT4Evw1TVOhyEaZP1MU7yQhNnW9bh0PWaPEY3WPIgETrwAXp0msdIY QiwcgzToDdfH79DxP88kTI2CZ1J/Qp1NJr+dK/Iq5Pnf6D2G6bS+l84ucQdngBJLYN ELRxYP8xjnQ85u1uaWx1kVoovLFLL2j5hOr6yBVo3fYhTmU5b9BI1zKQcV23emYKbz WqA9RHUK4wEaTi2eRWY+2+BSW6z0P3H2tTKpQqOrJLZnXbKnMGpPG6UZ1Z01pU8xMY puw2eGYMJupUg== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes Bob, I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered if the noise burst could be correlated with the event that John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John). [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ad4be66560ed407055baa7738753e104 Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_07DC_01CEDA68.CD5F4570" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1593 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_07DC_01CEDA68.CD5F4570 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes Bob, I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling wave. But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered if the noise burst could be correlated with the event that John (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John). Bob, the time scale on Hartmut's grabber plot is skewed at 2200 (in the image generated at 0215). Is that skew something that the plotter does to move the timestamp away from the date stamp? In other words, is the noise burst in Hartmut's plot after 2212, i.e. coincident with the event that John reported? 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:33 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Jim; Did you look at Hartmut's grabber? Just before I started transmitting there are these big blotches that look like noise of some kind. _____ From: hvanesce@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600 Subject: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Bob, This is puzzling; it doesn't seem to be attributable to any of the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, equipment. Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. Watching with interest! 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:31 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good... Looked like all of a sudden at around 2350 my transmitter blew up! But transmitter still at full smoke just no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... ------=_NextPart_000_07DC_01CEDA68.CD5F4570 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes Bob,

 

I originally attributed that noise burst around (2200?) to cultural = noise local to Hartmut. Seemed too strong and broad to be a traveling = wave.  But your comment had me reconsidering; and I then wondered = if the noise burst could be correlated with the event that John = (KB5NJD/WG2XIQ) just reported (thanks John).

 

Bob, the time scale on Hartmut’s grabber plot is skewed at 2200 = (in the image generated at 0215). Is that skew something that the = plotter does to move the timestamp away from the date stamp? In other = words, is the noise burst in Hartmut’s plot after 2212, i.e. = coincident with the event that John reported?

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob = Raide
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:33 PM
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE: LF: RE: 74.5495 was = looking good...

 

Jim;
Did you look at = Hartmut's grabber?
Just before I started transmitting there are these = big blotches that look like noise of some = kind.
 

From: hvanesce@comcast.net
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600
Subject: LF: RE: 74.5495 = was looking good...

Bob,

 

This is puzzling; it doesn’t seem to be attributable to any of = the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, = equipment.

 

Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. =

 

Watching with interest!

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

<= div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt = 0in 0in 0in;border-color:currentColor currentColor'>

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: = Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:31 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good...

=

 

=

Looked like all of a sudden = at around 2350 my transmitter blew up!  But transmitter still at = full smoke just no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... =

------=_NextPart_000_07DC_01CEDA68.CD5F4570--