Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp335159igb; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:35:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.106.227 with SMTP id gx3mr626048wib.15.1383708917124; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wp2si7375962wjc.153.2013.11.05.19.35.16 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VdskO-000232-RG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:21:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VdskO-00022t-98 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:21:32 +0000 Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.56]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VdskM-0005BW-4q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:21:31 +0000 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m1WZ1m0020cZkys562MUpl; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:21:28 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.147.71.189]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id m2M71m004451mrJ3W2MCE7; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:21:23 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:20:59 -0600 Message-ID: <07b801ceda96$deca1be0$9c5e53a0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQI6ma873u+i9oIZdmDldQaARxRDZZk/98Yw Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1383704488; bh=QJFi9bR8UZtirD01t6RbJWxgPJih/eQ1mAtqjybYIUg=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=ogqbYFdr3XLy+Vo7fR9grKLzwfqnF1HHUpAU3ej123heTLhjjstahQEhGFdL4TyaD cDqJItQDghsf/Ydvc5UFhDAFyhNkgojJXSVPhQMXBduEE/yRqstxcZJU+4gZvLA3JQ dyPmnjWDJlP6kNY67/lkCur0h6h2ybQVvlc4pl65znuF+3YTItrmOwg8quCSos1Mj7 oR07dkhgQyLxlgahWTzuvVlOjvY06GpTWNhmp5lgZ84GG8zO4hOEuclX4Lme1fk87P xcfMmAybhAkRrlOKzgJOhN3Gq02JHylzunR/+TYuc+8vB2gdtV4yfKEpSQktLdMAgg 4BUC32afuv4mg== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Bob, This is puzzling; it doesn't seem to be attributable to any of the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, equipment. Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.56 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 18c242620d7d7b91a1caf5740aa3e326 Subject: LF: RE: 74.5495 was looking good... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_07B9_01CEDA64.94304820" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 731 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_07B9_01CEDA64.94304820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob, This is puzzling; it doesn't seem to be attributable to any of the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, equipment. Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. Watching with interest! 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:31 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking good... Looked like all of a sudden at around 2350 my transmitter blew up! But transmitter still at full smoke just no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... ------=_NextPart_000_07B9_01CEDA64.94304820 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bob,

 

This is puzzling; it doesn’t seem to be attributable to any of = the usual suspects , including Dst indices, terminator, = equipment.

 

Atypical in many ways from historical trends of your signal. =

 

Watching with interest!

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob = Raide
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:31 PM
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 74.5495 was looking = good...

 

Looked like all of a sudden = at around 2350 my transmitter blew up!  But transmitter still at = full smoke just no propagation-Bob WG2XRS/4... =

------=_NextPart_000_07B9_01CEDA64.94304820--