Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp151986igb; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.10.136 with SMTP id i8mr618636wib.46.1381447064351; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bf10si19700639wjc.69.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VUOt1-00032a-CZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:39:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VUOt0-00032R-OD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:39:14 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VUOsy-0006wr-VB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:39:13 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W71 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:39:12 -0700 X-TMN: [M15Ufb/4+/DeZmCJzg1FyQ7xQYqhUfCu] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:39:10 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,,<5256A74B.3455.64E78B@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, ,<5256E621.14368.238DAF@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>,<036401cec5e6$1c11c680$54355380$@comcast.net>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2013 22:39:12.0269 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A9A33D0:01CEC609] X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe; Jay, W1VD is an expert with older receivers. I hope Jay may have some comments to help. It certainly appears it is very sensitive and just needs a stable HFO that you already mentioned-Bob > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:47:09 -0230 > From: jcraig@mun.ca > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least... > > Hi Jim, Bob, Group. > > The clock was UTC. The sigs increased until the capture then suddenly > disappeared. Thanks for the confirmation, Bob. The RX seems to work well > except the HFO needs work. A plan is to tap the 10.7 MHz OCXO LO to clock > an AD 9851 dds at 6x and use the output as the HFO. I think this will be > more stable, but it could be a silly idea. Comments are welcomed. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA > > > > > If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in UTC, the terminator > > idea is probably wrong. > > > > If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in local time, I > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 118b9e608370528226a3c3b3aedcdda0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_814d07bc-5db1-4949-a814-fdc1d654c014_" Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least... X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1413 --_814d07bc-5db1-4949-a814-fdc1d654c014_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe=3B Jay=2C W1VD is an expert with older receivers. I hope Jay may have some co= mments to help. It certainly appears it is very sensitive and just needs a= stable HFO that you already mentioned-Bob =20 > Date: Thu=2C 10 Oct 2013 19:47:09 -0230 > From: jcraig@mun.ca > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least... >=20 > Hi Jim=2C Bob=2C Group. >=20 > The clock was UTC. The sigs increased until the capture then suddenly > disappeared. Thanks for the confirmation=2C Bob. The RX seems to work w= ell > except the HFO needs work. A plan is to tap the 10.7 MHz OCXO LO to cloc= k=20 > an AD 9851 dds at 6x and use the output as the HFO. I think this will be > more stable=2C but it could be a silly idea. Comments are welcomed. >=20 > 73 > Joe VO1NA >=20 >=20 >=20 > > If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in UTC=2C the ter= minator > > idea is probably wrong. > > > > If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in local time=2C = I >=20 > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.p= hp >=20 = --_814d07bc-5db1-4949-a814-fdc1d654c014_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joe=3B
Jay=2C W1VD is an expe= rt with older =3Breceivers. =3B I hope Jay may have some comments t= o help. =3B It certainly appears it is very sensitive and =3Bjust n= eeds a stable HFO that you already mentioned-Bob
 =3B
>=3B= Date: Thu=2C 10 Oct 2013 19:47:09 -0230
>=3B From: jcraig@mun.ca
&= gt=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 Q= RSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least...
>=3B
>=3B Hi Jim=2C = Bob=2C Group.
>=3B
>=3B The clock was UTC. The sigs increased u= ntil the capture then suddenly
>=3B disappeared. Thanks for the confi= rmation=2C Bob. The RX seems to work well
>=3B except the HFO needs w= ork. A plan is to tap the 10.7 MHz OCXO LO to clock
>=3B an AD 9851 = dds at 6x and use the output as the HFO. I think this will be
>=3B mor= e stable=2C but it could be a silly idea. Comments are welcomed.
>=3B=
>=3B 73
>=3B Joe VO1NA
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B
>= =3B >=3B If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in UTC=2C = the terminator
>=3B >=3B idea is probably wrong.
>=3B >=3B>=3B >=3B If the clocks on Mike and Joe's spectrograms are both in loc= al time=2C I
>=3B
>=3B This electronic communication is governed= by the terms and conditions at
>=3B http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/ele= ctronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php
>=3B
=
= --_814d07bc-5db1-4949-a814-fdc1d654c014_--