Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp165142igb; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.77.167 with SMTP id t7mr26300644wjw.27.1381696357272; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1si23967768wjx.67.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VVRg5-0005hC-1Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:50:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VVRg4-0005h3-Hn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:50:12 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s34.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.45]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VVRg2-0003X5-Hh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:50:11 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W61 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s34.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:50:10 -0700 X-TMN: [1Y+sD8JNuY7KHFbfbsHM/MgrOjlJRpoi] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 15:50:10 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <525AE25B.7030107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: ,<52592361.10496.265B84@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> ,<525AE25B.7030107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2013 19:50:10.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D1AC130:01CEC84D] X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan; I am working with Jay as we speak to maybe incorporate GPS freq control. The two of them tried out the somewhat "perfected" OPDS and was getting- 48+ SNR decodes on 137 last night! I am using an HP signal generator similar to what Jay uses and just would like to get it good enough to try OPDS. A stable freq source of course could be used to advantage on other modes. Will see how things go and keep in touch-Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ab7de7439a3fce0b74220375dc6f18e8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_22911403-cd39-40e6-9795-e7c43c948237_" Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 generation X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1422 --_22911403-cd39-40e6-9795-e7c43c948237_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=3B I am working with Jay as we speak to maybe incorporate GPS freq control. T= he two of them tried out the somewhat "perfected" OPDS and was getting- 48+= SNR decodes on 137 last night! I am using an HP signal generator similar = to what Jay uses and just would like to get it good enough to try OPDS. A = stable freq source of course could be used to advantage on other modes. Will see how things go and keep in touch-Bob =20 Date: Sun=2C 13 Oct 2013 20:11:39 +0200 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74.5495 generation =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Am 12.10.2013 13:24=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A= =0A= =0A= Mike=3B =0A= Those captures are amazing! You caught me off guard as I didn't think=0A= anyone would see anything for hour or two and my signal generator would=0A= stabilize after about an hour! I didn't get home until after 2300 to=0A= warm it up. =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Bob=2C=20 =0A= =0A= Maybe you know there are soundcards sampling at 192 kS/s=2C which are=0A= able to generate frequencies of 0...96 kHz. If you can find such a=0A= soundcard=2C you could use that directly to generate your TX frequency=2C= =0A= which would be much more stable then. And when using SpecLab you can=0A= even generate DFCW-90 (or 120...)=2C and WSPR-15 or even slow hell :-) =0A= Maybe=2C if you plan to continuously improve the performance of your=0A= station=2C this would be a helpful device/advice :-) =0A= =0A= =0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC = --_22911403-cd39-40e6-9795-e7c43c948237_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan=3B
I =3Bam working= with Jay as we speak to maybe incorporate GPS freq control. =3B The tw= o of them tried =3Bout the somewhat =3B"perfected" OPDS =3Band = was getting- 48+ SNR decodes on 137 last night! =3B I am using an HP&nb= sp=3Bsignal generator similar to what Jay uses and just would like to get i= t good enough to try OPDS. =3B A stable freq source of course could be = used to advantage on other modes.
Will see how things go and keep in tou= ch-Bob
 =3B

Date: Sun=2C 13 Oct 2013= 20:11:39 +0200
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 74.5495 generation

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
=0A= Am 12.10.2013 13:24=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
=0A= =0A=
Mike=3B
=0A= Those captures are amazing! =3B =3BYou caught me off guard as I did= n't think=0A= anyone would see anything for hour or two and my signal generator would=0A= stabilize after about an hour! =3B I didn't get home until after 2300 t= o=0A= warm it up.
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A= Hi Bob=2C
=0A=
=0A= Maybe you know there are soundcards sampling at 192 kS/s=2C which are=0A= able to generate frequencies of 0...96 kHz. If you can find such a=0A= soundcard=2C you could use that directly to generate your TX frequency=2C= =0A= which would be much more stable then. And when using SpecLab you can=0A= even generate DFCW-90 (or 120...)=2C and WSPR-15 or even slow hell :-)
= =0A= Maybe=2C if you plan to continuously improve the performance of your=0A= station=2C this would be a helpful device/advice :-)
=0A=
=0A=
=0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
= --_22911403-cd39-40e6-9795-e7c43c948237_--