Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp122173pad; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:14:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.187.2 with SMTP id fo2mr23735579wic.65.1380723246910; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f5si775610wiy.25.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VRMea-0005Qe-77 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:39:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VRMeZ-0005QT-Ou for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:39:47 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s15.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VRMeY-0003bO-0F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:39:46 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W53 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s15.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:39:45 -0700 X-TMN: [bTN/7SxR/mNC/m7hytoGvR7KckfbOqOj] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:39:44 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <524BEE8D.4030304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: ,<524B5E48.1000405@gmail.com> ,<524BEE8D.4030304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2013 13:39:45.0166 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB003AE0:01CEBF74] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan; I noticed the same thing last year on 500. I found that 500 comes alive when temperatures drop and ground cools. I am surprised that LF works so well with these summer temps. Was 81 F here yesterday and 60 when I closed at around 0630 this day on 74.5-Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.26 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d7fcd9b75df8d1b09ddef9df028bd9ae Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_77fee9ce-80eb-4ea7-aeac-6b4030b62ea1_" Subject: RE: LF: No TA on MF :-( X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1550 --_77fee9ce-80eb-4ea7-aeac-6b4030b62ea1_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=3B I noticed the same thing last year on 500. I found that 500 comes alive wh= en temperatures drop and ground cools. I am surprised that LF works so wel= l with these summer temps. Was 81 F here yesterday and 60 when I closed at= around 0630 this day on 74.5-Bob =20 > Date: Wed=2C 2 Oct 2013 11:59:41 +0200 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: No TA on MF :-( >=20 > Dear group=2C >=20 > There is really a lot of WSPR MF activity on both sides of the pond. But= =20 > not a single TA decode. Why is this so much more difficult than on LF? > And BTW did we really made enough tests in MF WSPR-15 to be sure that=20 > there is no higher distance possible? >=20 > 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC = --_77fee9ce-80eb-4ea7-aeac-6b4030b62ea1_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan=3B
I noticed the same = thing last year on 500. =3B I found that 500 comes alive when temperatu= res drop and ground cools. =3B I am surprised that LF works so well wit= h these summer =3Btemps. =3B Was 81 F here yesterday and 60 when I = closed at around 0630 this day on 74.5-Bob
 =3B
>=3B Date:= Wed=2C 2 Oct 2013 11:59:41 +0200
>=3B From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-h= eidelberg.de
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: = LF: No TA on MF :-(
>=3B
>=3B Dear group=2C
>=3B
>=3B= There is really a lot of WSPR MF activity on both sides of the pond. But <= br>>=3B not a single TA decode. Why is this so much more difficult than o= n LF?
>=3B And BTW did we really made enough tests in MF WSPR-15 to be= sure that
>=3B there is no higher distance possible?
>=3B
&= gt=3B 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
= --_77fee9ce-80eb-4ea7-aeac-6b4030b62ea1_--