Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp433933igb; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:44:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.187.132 with SMTP id fs4mr1849242wjc.82.1382625864519; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j2si929041wje.159.2013.10.24.07.44.23 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VZM1o-0002br-Qt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:36:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VZM1o-0002bi-BY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:36:48 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s24.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.35]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VZM1m-0001s1-Gq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:36:47 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W39 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s24.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:36:45 -0700 X-TMN: [e34U4n7qOTJgx7QG+YyPEU7J9JKmKoi2] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:36:44 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <52693D06.31231.112298@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> References: <5268F7CC.866.32050D@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <52691B4E.7000102@gmail.com>,<52693D06.31231.112298@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2013 14:36:45.0771 (UTC) FILETIME=[76EDA1B0:01CED0C6] X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mike; Is that "pesky static" a characteristic of this band-from your passed experience? > From: mike.dennison@ntlworld.com > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:30:14 +0100 > Subject: Re: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) > > Well, Dex that was the good news. The bad news is that, as I > cautioned earlier, the lower noise level lower in the band was a > function of my antenna pass band, and not of absolute noise. I re- > tuned to a lower frequency and it wasn't any better. So the current > frequency seems as good as any. > > Interestingly, I left my SDR plotting a few kilohertz around 74k last > night with long integration and I could see the shape of my antenna > passband produced by the night-time static acting as a broadband > noise generator. At last, I have found a use for that pesky static! > > de Mike > ======= > > > > Mike Dennison wrote: > > > More pics including the XRS/5 caps. > > Thanks Mike! That's a keeper. > > > > Dex > > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.35 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_803093bb-ef1a-43aa-b9aa-3e1a1025bb6f_" Subject: RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1446 --_803093bb-ef1a-43aa-b9aa-3e1a1025bb6f_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike=3B Is that "pesky static" a characteristic of this band-from your passed exper= ience? =20 =20 > From: mike.dennison@ntlworld.com > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Thu=2C 24 Oct 2013 15:30:14 +0100 > Subject: Re: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) >=20 > Well=2C Dex that was the good news. The bad news is that=2C as I=20 > cautioned earlier=2C the lower noise level lower in the band was a=20 > function of my antenna pass band=2C and not of absolute noise. I re- > tuned to a lower frequency and it wasn't any better. So the current=20 > frequency seems as good as any.=20 >=20 > Interestingly=2C I left my SDR plotting a few kilohertz around 74k last=20 > night with long integration and I could see the shape of my antenna=20 > passband produced by the night-time static acting as a broadband=20 > noise generator. At last=2C I have found a use for that pesky static! >=20 > de Mike > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 >=20 > > Mike Dennison wrote: > > > More pics including the XRS/5 caps. > > Thanks Mike! That's a keeper. > >=20 > > Dex > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 = --_803093bb-ef1a-43aa-b9aa-3e1a1025bb6f_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mike=3B
Is that "pesky static= " a characteristic of this band-from your passed experience? =3B
&n= bsp=3B
>=3B From: mike.dennison@ntlworld.com
>=3B To: rsgb_l= f_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Date: Thu=2C 24 Oct 2013 15:30:14 +0100>=3B Subject: Re: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2)
>=3B=
>=3B Well=2C Dex that was the good news. The bad news is that=2C as = I
>=3B cautioned earlier=2C the lower noise level lower in the band w= as a
>=3B function of my antenna pass band=2C and not of absolute noi= se. I re-
>=3B tuned to a lower frequency and it wasn't any better. So= the current
>=3B frequency seems as good as any.
>=3B
>= =3B Interestingly=2C I left my SDR plotting a few kilohertz around 74k last=
>=3B night with long integration and I could see the shape of my ant= enna
>=3B passband produced by the night-time static acting as a broa= dband
>=3B noise generator. At last=2C I have found a use for that pe= sky static!
>=3B
>=3B de Mike
>=3B =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D>=3B
>=3B
>=3B >=3B Mike Dennison wrote:
>=3B >=3B = >=3B More pics including the XRS/5 caps.
>=3B >=3B Thanks Mike! T= hat's a keeper.
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B Dex
>=3B >=3B >=3B
>=3B
>=3B
= --_803093bb-ef1a-43aa-b9aa-3e1a1025bb6f_--