Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.216.214.132 with SMTP id c4csp113062wep; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:15:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.48.74 with SMTP id j10mr4170072wjn.41.1380586512891; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jd2si134836wic.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQn6P-0002UN-Eo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:42:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQn6O-0002UE-Mi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:42:08 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s21.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQn6M-0000Tg-Jy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:42:07 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W15 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s21.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:42:05 -0700 X-TMN: [tBifZC2eF7xRf1FbkoV05hqqohxDApAS] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:42:04 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <524A047E.3040601@gmail.com> References: <524999E7.3030001@gmx.de> <514630078B86410FB0CE8027D1FFFC0A@White>,<5249FB9C.9040702@gmail.com> ,<524A047E.3040601@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2013 23:42:05.0106 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB41F120:01CEBE36] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dex; I moved up a big .2 hz. Hartmut likes the upper part of the band. But hell-there are allot of clear spots around. Where we are ain't bad from what grabbers I have seen namely [Hartmut and Mr Vester's. Am sure the freq issue will get worked out-I wouldn't trim anything just yet! Am waiting to do the same here. Bob [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_77249264-a3f6-4a0e-8c3c-2156bf73193d_" Subject: RE: LF: 74.550kHz Sep 29/30 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1441 --_77249264-a3f6-4a0e-8c3c-2156bf73193d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dex=3B I moved up a big .2 hz.=20 Hartmut likes the upper part of the band. But hell-there are allot of clea= r spots around. Where we are ain't bad from what grabbers I have seen name= ly [Hartmut and Mr Vester's. =20 Am sure the freq issue will get worked out-I wouldn't trim anything just ye= t! Am waiting to do the same here. Bob =20 > Date: Mon=2C 30 Sep 2013 19:08:46 -0400 > From: dexter.mc@gmail.com > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: 74.550kHz Sep 29/30 >=20 > Bob Raide wrote: > > I plan on 74.549 as Hartmut is setup in that region of the band for=20 > > tonite. He likes this region of the band and have heard the same from= =20 > > F6CNI [hope I have that correct]. But on the Markus grabber I saw=20 > > allot of various "junk sigs" on the whole hz freqs. Last night I went= =20 > > down .1 Hz and Hartmut noticed it but did not comment. I was thinking= =20 > > of going up .2 hz and be right in the clear of that junk [74.5492]. I= =20 > > see the same happening on .548-for tonight Dex you could go with .2-.3= =20 > > up or down. Or if you have other listeners try 73.625 and see how=20 > > things shake out. Will give us all an idea of what is best for the=20 > > QRSS window. Bob > OK Bob=2C I'll move up a bit. The only reason for my suggesting a lower= =20 > frequency is because my variometer is in about a 50% bucking position=20 > for 74.550. When we settle on a frequency I'll make adjustments in the=20 > main coil. >=20 > I do have a request for a signal tonight so I'll let him know we're=20 > powering up. >=20 > Dex >=20 = --_77249264-a3f6-4a0e-8c3c-2156bf73193d_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dex=3B
I moved up a big .2 hz= .
Hartmut likes the upper part of the band. =3B But hell-there are = allot of clear spots around. =3B Where we are ain't bad from what grabb= ers I have seen namely =3B[Hartmut and Mr Vester's. =3B =3B Am sure the freq issue will get worked out-I wouldn't trim anything just y= et! =3B Am waiting to do the same here.
Bob
 =3B
>= =3B Date: Mon=2C 30 Sep 2013 19:08:46 -0400
>=3B From: dexter.mc@gmail= .com
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: Re: LF: = 74.550kHz Sep 29/30
>=3B
>=3B Bob Raide wrote:
>=3B >=3B = I plan on 74.549 as Hartmut is setup in that region of the band for
>= =3B >=3B tonite. He likes this region of the band and have heard the sam= e from
>=3B >=3B F6CNI [hope I have that correct]. But on the Mark= us grabber I saw
>=3B >=3B allot of various "junk sigs" on the whol= e hz freqs. Last night I went
>=3B >=3B down .1 Hz and Hartmut not= iced it but did not comment. I was thinking
>=3B >=3B of going up = .2 hz and be right in the clear of that junk [74.5492]. I
>=3B >= =3B see the same happening on .548-for tonight Dex you could go with .2-.3 =
>=3B >=3B up or down. Or if you have other listeners try 73.625 a= nd see how
>=3B >=3B things shake out. Will give us all an idea of= what is best for the
>=3B >=3B QRSS window. Bob
>=3B OK Bob= =2C I'll move up a bit. The only reason for my suggesting a lower
>= =3B frequency is because my variometer is in about a 50% bucking position <= br>>=3B for 74.550. When we settle on a frequency I'll make adjustments = in the
>=3B main coil.
>=3B
>=3B I do have a request for a= signal tonight so I'll let him know we're
>=3B powering up.
>= =3B
>=3B Dex
>=3B
= --_77249264-a3f6-4a0e-8c3c-2156bf73193d_--