Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp42246pad; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 14:59:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.89.233 with SMTP id br9mr17813341wjb.15.1381010339252; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 14:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id yw3si8199859wjc.158.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 14:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VSZI7-0006NG-By for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 22:21:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VSZI6-0006N7-Er for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 22:21:34 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VSZI4-0001Xq-FV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 22:21:33 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.27.191.32]) by mwinf5d21 with ME id ZZMU1m00J0iPVmi03ZMUgY; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 23:21:31 +0200 Message-ID: <904B5525F51F4A5B8D4BBFA65752509E@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <1380912236.760684954@f107.i.mail.ru> <1380913216.53884785@f27.i.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 22:21:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That's unfortunate Joe , may be not in time for this season ? 73 -G, From: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 1:27 PM To: Subject: LF: Update on 630m in Canada [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: Update on 630m in Canada Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3108 That's unfortunate Joe , may be not in time for this season ? 73 -G, -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 1:27 PM To: Subject: LF: Update on 630m in Canada > On Thursday, Industry Canada posted the comments received regarding the > proposal to grant 472-479 kHz to amateurs. All comments were favourable > but one from a plc proponent. The negative submission was substantiated > largely by dramatisation, conjecture and outright inaccuracies and cited > the unfortunate FCC decision to deny 137 kHz to our American peers. > > We can hope that reason will prevail and that the new band will soon > become available to Canadian amateurs. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >