Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp262116igb; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:00:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.60.73 with SMTP id f9mr2481549wjr.65.1382457640727; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a16si1666718wik.65.2013.10.22.09.00.40 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VYdsc-0002e1-JW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:28:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VYdsc-0002ds-0s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:28:22 +0100 Received: from omr-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.201]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VYdsZ-0002Hf-Gb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:28:20 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.74]) by omr-d04.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id EC5F570047BF1 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:28:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-dfd002a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dfd002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.55.71]) by mtaomg-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 7C24AE000088 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:28:16 -0400 (EDT) References: <8D09D27FF15D605-1144-34865@webmail-m103.sysops.aol.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <8D09D27FF15D605-1144-34865@webmail-m103.sysops.aol.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38109-BASIC Received: from 194.138.39.53 by Webmail-d108.sysops.aol.com (205.188.171.202) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:28:16 -0400 Message-Id: <8D09D527697128F-2298-36AF9@Webmail-d108.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [194.138.39.53] Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:28:16 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1382455696; bh=kRx499z8E52xouvy8vf7C3yZsyffq5xrCCvG9y81/OI=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i67aTyTou8IrQkuUZS/q5YduvzuGIzgfyHsaIenJApZt2/JykBPFPzxLuPXgPa1sq n1cqjo+NL30ST7nR7h/hngYh58p1ezc1gWIVeoT5cvvRmxHbXs22eHS/L7+A3lbfdL UI1AdypwUAGiBFSbGAbuODmv6MG0eEb7Io9/chng= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294a526699900a87 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dex, Â antennas are getting on in years, and so are we ;-) The one good thing about tree supports is that they grow taller with age: The pine tree supporting my southern top load leg has grown from 6 to 11 meters since I first attached a string in 1999. http://maps.google.de/maps?ll=49.4158,11.1350&z=21 Recently one of my neighbours has given hints about shading and possible pruning, which I hope to be able to divert for a while. Â Regarding ERP on 74 kHz: For a voltage limited E-field antenna, at half frequency you have to reduce input power until you have halved the current. In conjunction with the quarter radiation resistance, ERP would go down by a factor of 16! At VLF this is very severe: My small Marconi antenna, which can barely radiate 1 W ERP at 136 kHz, drops to 10 microwatts at 9 kHz. A similar same scaling also applies to loops driven at constant current. Â In addition, at lower frequencies trees around an E-field antenna shunt a larger portion of the displacement current to ground, due to the ratio of capacitive versus ohmic impedances. From my experience, this degradation disappears only during deep frost when trunks apparently become completely dry. Â Still hope to catch your 74 kHz beacon one of these days. However I suspect that the DCF77 noise may not be completely neglegible here, even between 1 Hz maxima. This might explain some of the perceived reception deficits in Germany, versus England and Holland. Â Best wishes, Markus (DF6NM) [...] Content analysis details: (0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.201 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 87525734ac0bb319fb3f44295fe6963b Subject: Re: LF: 74.5493 instead...(1of2) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D09D5276A2F979_2298_BD7A5_Webmail-d108.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_AOL_TAGS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1980 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D09D5276A2F979_2298_BD7A5_Webmail-d108.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Dex, =C2=A0 antennas are getting on in years, and so are we ;-) The one good thing abou= t tree supports is that they grow taller with age: The pine tree supporting= my southern top load leg has grown from 6 to 11 meters since I first attac= hed a string in 1999.=20 http://maps.google.de/maps?ll=3D49.4158,11.1350&z=3D21=20 Recently one of my neighbours has given hints about shading and possible pr= uning, which I hope to be able to divert for a while. =C2=A0 Regarding ERP on 74 kHz: For a voltage limited E-field antenna, at half fre= quency you have to reduce input power until you have halved the current. In= conjunction with the quarter radiation resistance, ERP would go down by a = factor of 16! At VLF this is very severe: My small Marconi antenna, which c= an barely radiate 1 W ERP at 136 kHz, drops to 10 microwatts at 9 kHz. A si= milar same scaling also applies to loops driven at constant current. =C2=A0 In addition, at lower frequencies trees around an E-field antenna shunt a l= arger portion of the displacement current to ground, due to the ratio of ca= pacitive versus ohmic impedances. From my experience, this degradation disa= ppears only during deep frost when trunks apparently become completely dry. =C2=A0 Still hope to catch your 74 kHz beacon one of these days. However I suspect= that the DCF77 noise may not be completely neglegible here, even between 1= Hz maxima. This might explain some of the perceived reception deficits in = Germany, versus England and Holland.=20 =C2=A0 Best wishes, Markus (DF6NM) =C2=A0 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <dexter.mc@gmail.com> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Verschickt: Mo, 21 Okt 2013 10:52 pm Betreff: Re: LF: 74.5493 instead...(1of2) I've been running /5 from sundown to sunup. 200 watts leaving the =20 shack. Perhaps the signal will improve when the oak trees under the top = =20 hat wires are bare. The leaves are just now beginning to fall. Most =20 of the several hundred feet of top hat wires run over a combination of =20 oak and pine trees. I've often wondered if my antenna would be more =20 efficient with more loading instead of having the top hat. I'll =20 probably never know because it would be way to much work to find out. =20 The antenna has been in use for 8 years. I may find out when the top =20 hat wire fails because I doubt I'm now able to replace them.=20 =20 Nice to at least see those traces Mike.=20 =20 Dex=20 =20 ... ----------MB_8D09D5276A2F979_2298_BD7A5_Webmail-d108.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Dex,
 
antennas a= re getting on in years, and so are we ;-) The one good thing about tree sup= ports is that they grow taller with age: The pine tree supporting my southe= rn top load leg has grown from 6 to 11 meters since I first attached a stri= ng in 1999.
Recently o= ne of my neighbours has given hints about shading and possible pruning, whi= ch I hope to be able to divert for a while.
 
Regarding = ERP on 74 kHz: For a voltage limited E-field antenna, at half frequency you= have to reduce input power until you have halved the current. In conjuncti= on with the quarter radiation resistance, ERP would go down by a factor of = 16! At VLF this is very severe: My small Marconi antenna, which can barely = radiate 1 W ERP at 136 kHz, drops to 10 microwatts at 9 kHz. A similar same= scaling also applies to loops driven at constant current.
 
In additio= n, at lower frequencies trees around an E-field antenna shunt a larger port= ion of the displacement current to ground, due to the ratio of capacitive v= ersus ohmic impedances. From my experience, this degradation disappears onl= y during deep frost when trunks apparently become completely dry.
 
Still hope= to catch your 74 kHz beacon one of these days. However I suspect that the = DCF77 noise may not be completely neglegible here, even between 1 Hz maxima= . This might explain some of the perceived reception deficits in Germany, v= ersus England and Holland.
 
Best wishe= s,
Markus (DF6NM)

 
-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <dexte= r.mc@gmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mo, 21 Okt 2013 10:52 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: 74.5493 instead...(1of2)


I've been running /5 from sundown to sunu=
p.  200 watts leaving the  
shack. Perhaps the signal will improve when the oak trees under the top =
hat wires are bare. The leaves are just now beginning to fall. Most of the several hundred feet of top hat wires run over a combination of oak and pine trees. I've often wondered if my antenna would be more
efficient with more loading instead of having the top hat. I'll
probably never know because it would be way to much work to find out. The antenna has been in use for 8 years. I may find out when the top hat wire fails because I doubt I'm now able to replace them.

Nice to at least see those traces Mike.

Dex

...
----------MB_8D09D5276A2F979_2298_BD7A5_Webmail-d108.sysops.aol.com--