Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp219895igb; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:47:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.12.243 with SMTP id b19mr15197727wic.18.1381765656016; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id vt5si25377005wjc.113.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VVjqk-0000dd-9g for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:14:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VVjqj-0000dU-Jh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:14:25 +0100 Received: from smtpout10.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VVjqh-00070C-UA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:14:24 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090208.525C0A4F.0007,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=38/97,refid=2.7.2:2013.10.12.191516:17:38.936,ip=86.151.99.250,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __FRAUD_SUBJ_ALLCAPS, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __CP_MEDIA_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_1500_1599, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[250.99.151.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (86.151.99.250) by smtpout10.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.09) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5258F7F4002E17C3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:14:22 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1381763663; bh=P4sSf8g5hQbfNBQnqnD0asDMFkLG56vukDItrg+XPe4=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer; b=UA4aTBgLHvi7S5z5TRJsNGiIMYrdFHIer/gtCAiNY0xep94zlCnL1ARoEUJdei8mr+qcLDMSq7PXv5+of0i5IFhjwOLcSmzp9SrMTj+F0MmY+yPTEpv2Y+E8hhZTeWPXt6SG2ftdhD/rThqTlaY/eZ5rOIZWmdS1iN0QYnes9NM= Message-ID: <53C6B32AE524479EBC91C711E2C66907@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <000701cec8e0$cbe93190$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:14:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131014-0, 14/10/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay yes speculation it is but it is interesting to check where the shadow is at 100km altitude when the sig comes in. There is also the possibility of an E-region hop followed by a D-region hop. The last is unlikely to my mind as D-region hops are much more highly attenuated by the photo-dissociated electrons and towards late afternoon as the solar angle decreases the attenuation increases. But its all hypothetical, as far as I am concerned :-)) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: LF: Re: OPDS T/A DF6NM Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 913 Hi Jay yes speculation it is but it is interesting to check where the shadow is at 100km altitude when the sig comes in. There is also the possibility of an E-region hop followed by a D-region hop. The last is unlikely to my mind as D-region hops are much more highly attenuated by the photo-dissociated electrons and towards late afternoon as the solar angle decreases the attenuation increases. But its all hypothetical, as far as I am concerned :-)) Good Luck with it all. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:25 PM Subject: LF: OPDS T/A DF6NM > Markus > > Success with two of the four transmission periods last night - early and > late. Had you been transmitting at 2300Z we probably would have had > another decode. 2200Z might be a little early right now. > > As we head into mid winter conditions keep in mind earliest reception of > T/A signals have occured here (from well equipped transmitting stations > like CT1DRP, DF6NM etc) around 2045Z (1545 EST) - well before local > sunset. Alan has speculated this may be single hop. We may be able to push > that time back a bit with OP Deep Search. Also looking forward to possible > reception of more distant stations ... particularly Russian stations. > > 2013-10-14 04:33:26 DF6NM 6258km 137570.046Hz 3mHz -48.9dBOp 85% > 16.9dB > 2013-10-14 00:33:28 DF6NM 6258km 137570.047Hz 6mHz -44.4dBOp 91% > 17.3dB > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 > > >