Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp41991igb; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:02:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.12.238 with SMTP id b14mr3612306wic.44.1382209345149; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o6si6007069wib.56.2013.10.19.12.02.24 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VXbGb-0006wH-8V for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:28:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VXbGa-0006w8-QY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:28:48 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VXbGZ-0005Xe-1F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:28:47 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([91.38.13.74]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgoiC-1VKLhW04wq-00M1Pl for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:28:46 +0200 Message-ID: <5262CF5C.4000901@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:28:44 +0200 From: Tobias DG3LV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC7F013@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>,<5262AFB9.9080302@gmx.net> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC7F1A5@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FC7F1A5@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0z+ygSPFjxkMYZxO4fx+hNVoIXIU2/jQ2cqLgPRf1T1MzCnM/Kl exm3VCM1E7rT2ewO2nTNfOhj+BmyWIqBAaBZzlbZbk+w4+5YjpmdzjW4Gmksw09ioKOYWj1 bmu7VJGNXVVW8PoJVcYIpDjclTnM4NPzuMvJxzCmdRv40mooe+TAGNSRUSRK9LzTIpCif+9 SMvjux0r4gNFFqDeCzNUA== X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Rik ! A second station will be Sven DF2FF, we have just done some tests with the new version of WSJT-X and had some QSOs. He is using a Softrock RxTx6.2 as I do. After 20:00h UTC conditions might be good enough to try some QSOs? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dg3lv[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2384 Hi Rik ! A second station will be Sven DF2FF, we have just done some tests with the new version of WSJT-X and had some QSOs. He is using a Softrock RxTx6.2 as I do. After 20:00h UTC conditions might be good enough to try some QSOs? 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 19.10.2013 19:05, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hi Tobias, > > I don't have a specific day/hour in mind. Let's see if there is some more response. > About "linear operation": I assume that you refer to frequency conversion. The amplifiers do not have to be linear for JT2 (and WSPR). In fact I do use a class D push-pull PA. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens Tobias DG3LV [DG3LV@gmx.net] > Verzonden: zaterdag 19 oktober 2013 18:13 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: JT9 QSO on 475kHz? > > Hi Rik ! > > Yes, would be nice to have some QSOs again. At what time did you intend > to begin trying a QSO? > > There should be a couple of stations around, which are capable of linear > operation. > > Just updated my WSJT-X installation with > latest version of WSJT-X (dated 4.October 2013): > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_121r3590.exe > > latest Manual rev 1.2, (dated 16.August 2013) > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT-X_Users_Guide_v1.2.pdf > > 73 de dg3lv Tobias > > Am 19.10.2013 11:28, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >> Dear all, >> >> there is a lot of WSPR activity on 475kHz recently. >> >> Checking wsprnet.org I noticed that I copied 34 stations and was copied >> by 67 stations. 25 of these were copied by me and copied me, so >> potential QSO partners in JT9-2 mode. >> >> Anyone interested in some JT9 tests ? >> >> It would be nice to make some QSO's in this mode. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> >