Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp151896igb; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:54:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.168.3 with SMTP id zs3mr4171311lbb.2.1382133262450; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ds1si1613444lac.151.2013.10.18.14.54.21 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VXHz2-0000rt-62 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:53:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VXHz1-0000rk-JY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:53:23 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VXHyz-0001aO-3l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:53:22 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9ILrKHm030743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:53:20 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r9ILrJwN022768 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:53:19 +0200 Message-ID: <5261ADCA.8000103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:53:14 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701cecb29$d06ee7f0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <2A50C7B96485434983B3AFAD5AC1432F@AGB> <1382118806.496011265@f276.i.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, Am 18.10.2013 20:17, schrieb Markus Vester: > I'm not sure if I'd be happy about a strong signal, like that from > Stefan, being hard-keyed once a second throughout the night... What is the problem? Tell me when you go to bed and when you wake up. I can transmit during that time. Then you don't see and hear it :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: Re[2]: T/A OPDS DK7FC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020600080708070402030807" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2719 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020600080708070402030807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus, Am 18.10.2013 20:17, schrieb Markus Vester: > I'm not sure if I'd be happy about a strong signal, like that from > Stefan, being hard-keyed once a second throughout the night... What is the problem? Tell me when you go to bed and when you wake up. I can transmit during that time. Then you don't see and hear it :-) > In any case, as far as I know, there are a few LF receivers set up > for Op-8, but none for Op-4 so far. Yes, if we start faster modes for TA then i would also prefer OPDS-8 for the next step. 73, Stefan --------------020600080708070402030807 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r9ILrKHm030743 Hi Markus,

Am 18.10.2013 20:17, schrieb Markus Vester:
I'm not sure=C2=A0if I'd be happy = about a strong signal, like that from Stefan, being hard-keyed once a second=C2=A0throughout the night...

What is the problem? Tell me when you go to bed and when you wake up. I can transmit during that time. Then you don't see and hear it :-)

In any case, as far as=C2=A0I kno= w, there are a few=C2=A0 LF=C2=A0receivers set up for=C2=A0Op-8, but none fo= r Op-4=C2=A0so far.
Yes, if we start faster modes for TA then i would also prefer OPDS-8 for the next step.

73, Stefan
--------------020600080708070402030807--