Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp116609igb; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:02:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.60.73 with SMTP id f9mr487810wjr.65.1382101347708; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ll10si518275wjb.109.2013.10.18.06.02.27 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VX9I8-0006Is-44 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:36:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VX9I7-0006Ij-LP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:36:31 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VX9I5-000828-Ns for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:36:30 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9ICaRQi026642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:36:28 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r9ICaSHN022758 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:36:28 +0200 Message-ID: <52612B46.4020701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:36:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701cecb29$d06ee7f0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <525FCC72.3080506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002001cecb35$90568ea0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <525FFA57.1020001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <525FFAD3.2000406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005401cecb51$fb859bf0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <52608759.1070509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <526090AA.20402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <003101cecbab$78a2e2b0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <52611614.7090703@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <52611614.7090703@charter.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi John, Jay, Markus, OK. Well, it seems to work. But i can't value the results. Why is it only 96% and what is the meaning of 2 mHz here? Seems the S/N is rather low. Condx must have been poor. Were there other reports from US stns? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3032 Hi John, Jay, Markus, OK. Well, it seems to work. But i can't value the results. Why is it only 96% and what is the meaning of 2 mHz here? Seems the S/N is rather low. Condx must have been poor. Were there other reports from US stns? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.10.2013 13:05, schrieb John Andrews: > Stefan, Markus, Jay, > > Results from last night: > > 2013-10-18 05:09:25 DK7FC 5981km 137560.016Hz 2mHz -42.8dBOp 96% > 20.6dB > 2013-10-18 04:29:25 DK7FC 5981km 137560.016Hz 2mHz -44.8dBOp 96% > 17.8dB > 2013-10-18 03:49:23 DK7FC 5981km 137560.016Hz 2mHz -44.0dBOp 96% > 20.3dB > 2013-10-18 03:09:23 DK7FC 5981km 137560.017Hz 2mHz -43.7dBOp 96% > 19.0dB > 2013-10-18 02:29:23 DK7FC 5981km 137560.016Hz 3mHz -47.5dBOp 96% > 17.9dB > 2013-10-18 01:49:23 DK7FC 5981km 137560.016Hz 3mHz -46.4dBOp 80% > 16.8dB > > John, W1TAG