Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp63761igb; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:39:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.182.15 with SMTP id ea15mr4992914wic.16.1381361972217; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ph3si4786124wic.83.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VU2bu-0001pL-9B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:52:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VU2bt-0001pC-Sx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:52:05 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VU2bs-000161-2L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:52:04 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r99Mq3jh006767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:52:03 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r99Mq3b2021675 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:52:03 +0200 Message-ID: <5255DE0E.6040708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:51:58 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5253513B.7030805@virginbroadband.com.au> <7DA570935EC8481A950D4B6845E2DA74@White> <5255C6B3.3040403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5255CEB1.4040406@virginbroadband.com.au> <237E959E00EB4B8694B0EFA60D57CF50@White> <5255DC07.2090009@virginbroadband.com.au> In-Reply-To: <5255DC07.2090009@virginbroadband.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Edgar, Markus, Am 10.10.2013 00:43, schrieb edgar: > Hi Markus, > > This is the DCF39 plot from the best DK7FC signal capture last April, > between 18:00 and 19:00 UTC. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/DCF39%20WR%20ver%20plot%202013-04-08%2021-30.jpg > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: LF: Signal detection question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2970 Hi Edgar, Markus, Am 10.10.2013 00:43, schrieb edgar: > Hi Markus, > > This is the DCF39 plot from the best DK7FC signal capture last April, > between 18:00 and 19:00 UTC. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/DCF39%20WR%20ver%20plot%202013-04-08%2021-30.jpg > Pff, DCF-39 is just 18 dB S/N at best! But BTW, Edgar, are all the plots referred to 1 Hz NBW (not only the noise)? > > This is this mornings plot at Moonah. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/101251787/Copy%20of%20dcf39%20hga22%20plot%20m.png > Looks much better!! I've been TXing WSPR-15 though :-( Need several antennas it seems... Tnx for the data Edgar, and you good data archive and documentation. And all the efforts! 73, Stefan > > Regards, Edgar > > > >