Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp59457igb; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:09:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.198.115 with SMTP id jb19mr4651661wic.28.1381356569270; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gi17si4659193wic.20.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VU1c9-0001Fj-Np for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:48:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VU1c9-0001FX-9y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:48:17 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VU1c7-0000p1-5C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:48:16 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r99LmEwC011920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:48:14 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r99LmEkH019180 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:48:14 +0200 Message-ID: <5255CF19.8060203@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:48:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003d01cec4e3$0cb8eff0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> In-Reply-To: <003d01cec4e3$0cb8eff0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay, Many thanks for the reports. So it's not that bad, obviously. Also thanks to W1TAG for watching. For some reason SpecLab didn't disable the RS232 (PTT) and so i was TXing WSPR-15 the whole day and still in the moment. I'll let it run another night on LF... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 195b836cb7437e99aa05107459888659 Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 15 T/A tonite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2898 Hi Jay, Many thanks for the reports. So it's not that bad, obviously. Also thanks to W1TAG for watching. For some reason SpecLab didn't disable the RS232 (PTT) and so i was TXing WSPR-15 the whole day and still in the moment. I'll let it run another night on LF... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 09.10.2013 13:31, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > > Further to previous post. > > Note to self: predicting conditions is risky business ... > > 2013-10-09 05:30 DK7FC 0.137610 -35 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > 2013-10-09 05:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -34 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > 2013-10-09 04:30 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > 2013-10-09 04:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -37 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > 2013-10-09 03:30 DK7FC 0.137610 -33 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > 2013-10-09 03:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > 2013-10-09 02:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls > 6099 295 > > All this with unfavorable DST ... check it out: > > http://lasp.colorado.edu/space_weather/dsttemerin/dsttemerin.html > > Maybe Alan can chime in with his thoughts. Signal remained at a > constant low level throughout the period. > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:22 PM > Subject: WSPR 15 T/A tonite > > >> Stefan >> >> Nice copy of your WSPR15 considering DST is around -50 nT. Not sure >> condx will hold up as the night progresses. >> >> 013-10-09 02:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 >> >> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XSR/2 >