Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp66479pad; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:14:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.22.97 with SMTP id c1mr2378547wjf.43.1380899644246; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j2si5530256wje.159.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VS6ir-0000O7-9S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:51:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VS6iq-0000Ny-T4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:51:16 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VS6il-0006pp-A9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:51:15 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r94EpA5r017863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:51:10 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r94Ep9go001650 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:51:09 +0200 Message-ID: <524ED5D9.4050701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:51:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <524BF0F8.3070603@gmx.net> <524C0DF2.8000908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524C2B66.2050704@gmx.net> <524DADA6.8060907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524DF565.6000806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524E9F14.9000208@gmx.net> <524EBBE9.6080403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524ED377.1050606@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <524ED377.1050606@gmx.net> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 04.10.2013 16:40, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: > No station to test ? Use G0HNW for a test, he is constantly decoded > here with -24 at noon, to now -28 (16:33h local), he is the unique > signal on the band, no NDBs, no other carriers visible from 472 to > 479, just him. Nice ! (there have been some very faint traces from you > at noon, but no decodes.) How should i be able to decode G0HNW in daytime while you cannot decode me?! It shows the land path attenuation between us and shows that this attenuation is MUCH lower for a path over salt water, like between you and G0HNW. But he decoded me one time so far :-) So the question is the difference in ERP and the QRM... [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3323 Am 04.10.2013 16:40, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: > No station to test ? Use G0HNW for a test, he is constantly decoded > here with -24 at noon, to now -28 (16:33h local), he is the unique > signal on the band, no NDBs, no other carriers visible from 472 to > 479, just him. Nice ! (there have been some very faint traces from you > at noon, but no decodes.) How should i be able to decode G0HNW in daytime while you cannot decode me?! It shows the land path attenuation between us and shows that this attenuation is MUCH lower for a path over salt water, like between you and G0HNW. But he decoded me one time so far :-) So the question is the difference in ERP and the QRM... 73, Stefan