Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp66475pad; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.242.200 with SMTP id ws8mr2003638wjc.60.1380899642144; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k9si5555008wjf.39.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VS6Yu-00009y-1Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:41:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VS6Yt-00009l-Jt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:40:59 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VS6Ys-0006lN-1w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:40:58 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([91.38.37.118]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZwYd-1V6s7D2z9z-00Lof9 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:40:56 +0200 Message-ID: <524ED377.1050606@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:40:55 +0200 From: Tobias DG3LV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <524BF0F8.3070603@gmx.net> <524C0DF2.8000908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524C2B66.2050704@gmx.net> <524DADA6.8060907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524DF565.6000806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524E9F14.9000208@gmx.net> <524EBBE9.6080403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <524EBBE9.6080403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:p69G4hTj54kIO/nTI/m0izZX4SX1l75A+4DNQp9/KCkdV6bGW0g OAXF2LmnD8zlattlrNGjHk0rvsDlu2iC3zKj+MdSlAU2P+4b18IjpQlOFou64eJcgvoeaqi FkFi0x1WjIGiTcE/dqzwZCPP0lOr/z5AsARfKsgP8W3DYbTx1DAteP6S6mZOWIjmb120764 VhD/XwoofJVOg3J0S0omA== X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan ! No, I did not test the blanker. My HDSDR program has two noiseblankers implemented (at HF and IF), they work very well. I'm waiting for some documentation on the new feature until I will/can use it. [...] Content analysis details: (0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dg3lv[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3322 Hi Stefan ! No, I did not test the blanker. My HDSDR program has two noiseblankers implemented (at HF and IF), they work very well. I'm waiting for some documentation on the new feature until I will/can use it. No station to test ? Use G0HNW for a test, he is constantly decoded here with -24 at noon, to now -28 (16:33h local), he is the unique signal on the band, no NDBs, no other carriers visible from 472 to 479, just him. Nice ! (there have been some very faint traces from you at noon, but no decodes.) 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 04.10.2013 15:00, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > > Am 04.10.2013 12:57, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: >> [...] >> >> Maybe a problem with installation directory name? (NO "Spaces"!) > > Oh, yes, thanks. That was the reason. Now it works but in the moment i > have no test signals except my own which is a bit strong here. Did you > already experiment with the NB level settings? > What could be best for MF? > > 73, Stefan > > >> >> Am 04.10.2013 00:53, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> Tobias, >>> >>> I've made a short test using the new version and the old simultaneously, >>> using the same audio input. There are no decodes at all in the new >>> version, with or without the SpecLab NB enabled. The waterfal looks >>> equal in both versions... >>> Does it work on your side? >>> >>> 73, Stefan > >