Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp56894pad; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.20.46 with SMTP id k14mr7433696wie.39.1380892886164; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 06:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v7si2261430wiw.73.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 06:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VS4zi-0008HS-Jp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:00:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VS4zi-0008HJ-7K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:00:34 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VS4zg-0006QW-N3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:00:33 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r94D0UqA015740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:00:30 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r94D0USg028892 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: <524EBBE9.6080403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 15:00:25 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <524BF0F8.3070603@gmx.net> <524C0DF2.8000908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524C2B66.2050704@gmx.net> <524DADA6.8060907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524DF565.6000806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <524E9F14.9000208@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <524E9F14.9000208@gmx.net> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r94D0UqA015740 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 04.10.2013 12:57, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: > [...] > > Maybe a problem with installation directory name? (NO "Spaces"!) Oh, yes, thanks. That was the reason. Now it works but in the moment i have no test signals except my own which is a bit strong here. Did you already experiment with the NB level settings? What could be best for MF? [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: WSPRX_08r3575 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3331 Am 04.10.2013 12:57, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: > [...] > > Maybe a problem with installation directory name? (NO "Spaces"!) Oh, yes, thanks. That was the reason. Now it works but in the moment i=20 have no test signals except my own which is a bit strong here. Did you=20 already experiment with the NB level settings? What could be best for MF? 73, Stefan > > Am 04.10.2013 00:53, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: >> Tobias, >> >> I've made a short test using the new version and the old simultaneousl= y, >> using the same audio input. There are no decodes at all in the new >> version, with or without the SpecLab NB enabled. The waterfal looks >> equal in both versions... >> Does it work on your side? >> >> 73, Stefan