Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp17826igb; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:47:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.76.48 with SMTP id h16mr20643319wiw.32.1381859254154; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fy1si27521492wjb.65.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VW7ym-0004Bn-DV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:00:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VW7ym-0004Be-0K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:00:20 +0100 Received: from mta41.charter.net ([216.33.127.83]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VW7yk-0003AP-7m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:00:18 +0100 Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta41.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20131015170016.VOMK10143.mta41.charter.net@imp10> for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:00:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([74.94.151.157]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id dV0E1m00W3Q0UcS05V0FEa; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:00:16 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=brYUnzmi c=1 sm=1 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:17 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=sRRgS-gyShIA:10 a=C_IRinGWAAAA:8 a=iiLknHI6QARxdF3agpsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=si9q_4b84H0A:10 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:117 X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ= References: <004e01cec9af$e2335dc0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: John Andrews X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) In-Reply-To: <004e01cec9af$e2335dc0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Message-Id: <3B1A01A5-1C61-4AD3-B557-49B133EB8871@charter.net> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:00:14 -0400 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I got the OPDS stuff running last night, but no results, either. There was a weak CME impact this morning, and there may be some other small events to come. This would keep the Dst from recovering quickly, and TA prop depressed until these recently active spots "turn the corner" at the end of the week. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.83 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: OPDS T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2531 I got the OPDS stuff running last night, but no results, either.=20 There was a weak CME impact this morning, and there may be some other small e= vents to come. This would keep the Dst from recovering quickly, and TA prop d= epressed until these recently active spots "turn the corner" at the end of t= he week.=20 John, W1TAG > On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:07 AM, wrote: >=20 > Markus >=20 > No reception of your OPDS32 transmissions last night ... DST hovering arou= nd -55 nT the likely culprit. Currently we're at -40 nT and rising ... altho= ugh there can be lag time between DST recovery and good conditions. These nu= mbers, after all, are really just 'best guesses' in the short term that get c= orrected a month or so later. >=20 > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2=20 >=20