Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp61226igb; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:45:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.219.33 with SMTP id pl1mr4812575wic.49.1381358723707; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mu6si12754wib.2.2013.10.09.15.45.22 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VU26b-0001Xw-Do for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:19:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VU26b-0001Xf-0V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:19:45 +0100 Received: from omr-m07.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.81]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VU26Y-0000yR-KF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:19:43 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.132]) by omr-m07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id BFCC47003549A for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from White (95-91-237-85-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.85]) by mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 2FEA8E000086 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <237E959E00EB4B8694B0EFA60D57CF50@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <5253513B.7030805@virginbroadband.com.au> <7DA570935EC8481A950D4B6845E2DA74@White> <5255C6B3.3040403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5255CEB1.4040406@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:19:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1381357180; bh=Rc6kwArcKsIwG7oItjDDNoUf7BMtmaUCvQ7ORmCOs7E=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B3hwgiJJnA+SAsBNucFLPT+egVyWxgl8qRAPbC+wMhdPAS/bl+Dk79TH7Ih4cuwb/ LYE7SHVPXNrGcvuV+wshzTmtR/9qynfP8ceS5uQTOx9hVhON6ZIQV8g1BlLzokN2CJ hhOxevGOCkmFmsQHxvywRatT/1ISodXAu56wZ26U= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33845255d67c1e86 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.85 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Edgar, yes that would be interesting. Have you been keeping daily logfiles from the DCF / HGA plots? 73, Markus [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.143.81 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: Signal detection question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEC54E.683FB690" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2966 Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEC54E.683FB690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Edgar, yes that would be interesting. Have you been keeping daily logfiles from = the DCF / HGA plots? 73, Markus From: edgar=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 11:46 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Signal detection question Hi Stefan and Markus, A comparison of DCF39 reception now and previously should give some=20 indication of the propagation difference. Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEC54E.683FB690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Edgar,
 
yes that would be interesting. = Have you been=20 keeping daily logfiles from the DCF / HGA plots?
 
73, Markus

From: edgar
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Signal detection question

Hi=20 Stefan and Markus,

A comparison of DCF39 reception now and = previously=20 should give some
indication of the propagation = difference.

Regards,=20 Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.



------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CEC54E.683FB690--