Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp139241igb; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:02:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.20.177 with SMTP id o17mr9012093wie.38.1381431764918; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j2si19248005wje.159.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VUL2g-0002LF-Jh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:32:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VUL2g-0002L6-2Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:32:58 +0100 Received: from qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VUL2d-00066e-Gc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:32:56 +0100 Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bVur1m0041zF43QA5WYtbp; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:32:53 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.147.68.213]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bWYX1m00G4c50Lu8kWYd4z; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:32:48 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: , <5256A74B.3455.64E78B@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <5256F957.541.6E9747@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:32:30 -0500 Message-ID: <036601cec5e7$1e991830$5bcb4890$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHIIVr8jnCO1+scRtTTiNi/NlgDMwM9hhISAgwa5wqZ0TzPYIAAAYzw Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1381429973; bh=iXwEMKAYRswEdBe5jWTrsWGa0sF1y20Od8Mga+RcXsQ=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=mX5wL35XVirocwM9DEoaU7V5E44LmJpCoKvdyAZJCoGec+L4ex4gKPsK3+vVPgLEF vaj4ad8e4V6QKP+R+isPrEHMYYIcXsVC+jC9O8MsEPnAX15RmhxqZ+d5yD4cvOoMIJ mPXuGvC5dEZbYpjs7/6iI9R67ONZfKW7Bd78DXEIhKvN/qB71Jn/5BGLjWKymhwKPn Nmw8P6c5J4BS7GUtrOYN+09rmIuXDD2Z3TsM34JBipXEaD2IJCFZF4R1wqJ4I41Ze4 pNndpeM/sEBdjEtOIStEzKPLfqTjFqTXSRrr06Z8WJCI+g2hE+JPv3E6LP/EhAvDMH dFaV18Sb+ElFg== X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mike, I had not yet seen your message below when I sent mine. Your message answers my question regarding the E-W path to your QTH. Do you have any thoughts on the emergence of Bob's signal at Joe's location at a similar spectrogram timestamp? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: RE: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1410 Mike, I had not yet seen your message below when I sent mine. Your message answers my question regarding the E-W path to your QTH. Do you have any thoughts on the emergence of Bob's signal at Joe's location at a similar spectrogram timestamp? Regards, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Mike Dennison Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:01 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 74.5495 QRSS 60 starts at 2330 till 0500 at least... By the way, Bob, the peak in readability at 0600 is probably not the best west-east propagation, but more likely the heavy QRN received by skywave from the east fading out here. Mike ==== > Traces seen here at around 0600UTC? The lines near the top of the > attached picture are probably Loran. Frequency scale: 0=74.549kHz. > Mike, G3XDV > > > WG2XRS/4 [XRS4] NY possibly with company [/3 &/5] each one Hz > > lower-any captures appreciated-Bob... > > >