Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp45917igb; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:56:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.211.237 with SMTP id nf13mr29960731wic.55.1382028970248; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f3si2956337wiv.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VWpzt-0002IK-VK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:00:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VWpzt-0002IB-Em for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:00:25 +0100 Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VWpzr-0004GO-7T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:00:24 +0100 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eFRX1m0080cZkys5EG0MA2; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:00:21 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eG0L1m0130CFS1j3WG0Mv3; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:00:21 +0000 Message-ID: <005401cecb51$fb859bf0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <000701cecb29$d06ee7f0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <525FCC72.3080506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002001cecb35$90568ea0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <525FFA57.1020001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <525FFAD3.2000406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:00:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1382025621; bh=evzfuguRYtiWOQhckayca8rAdNIaK1DywMIvglfssEg=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=k0CItKJv9Rfj6UkPccs5atUUaFKRtAZjxlmKzc0zOeOFibAFgia0i73w+mf52t4Mp NnDmRk6Umi097MFUZChSJ0jmDAm95owHaLo1UEMmwJtsJnyMTUspt9Q6w86wZpE/yy CnarB8q3NT+XXbY9zuQJ0guuKphCj6vqDYxRqXfoyilOz8Gg36Rr9lRtiaQb1ygODe t1Ri+IHuS1vhmC1FJDdFtpxx2QEYAivcB/QZy+YOoIdJa4VugQD/aeV3hii6Iup5wt FYRm/up/t+AOAf88C4NoquzyGfFzL0vylgd2CKBM/3EGw/daSVL7ui5WDzRN56A7jm kk7iRbGI5B1/A== X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Wasn't expecting you to start transmitting OPDS today ... just a thought for the future. But if you want to, that's okay too. OPDS32 is capable of of decoding at about -50 dB s/n (relative to SSB bandwidth). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3042 Stefan Wasn't expecting you to start transmitting OPDS today ... just a thought for the future. But if you want to, that's okay too. OPDS32 is capable of of decoding at about -50 dB s/n (relative to SSB bandwidth). Your call and grid is easily added at the receiving end. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:57 AM Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC PS: Jay, Markus, What is the S/N performance of OPDS compared to WSPR-15 (apart from the fact that the callsigns must be known in advance and that there is less information into one sequence) ?? 73, Stefan Am 17.10.2013 16:55, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Jay, > > Am 17.10.2013 14:36, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >> >> Several stations on this end are now set up to receive OP Deep Search ... including Garry K3SIW >> in IL. Being that far inland is quite a disadvantage for T/A signal reception compared to >> 'coastal' stations. > Garry got several WSPR-15 decodes of me last season, so i think he could make it in OPDS as well. >> >> On my end I'm interested to see if it's possible to roll back the earliest T/A reception times >> (current best of about 2045Z mid season). There are probably other 'unknowns' waiting to be >> discovered along the way ;~) . > OK, i can give it a try. Not sure if i can make it today arround 20 UTC but i will try. > Am i already included in the OPDS list as a possible station? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC