Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.66.253.69 with SMTP id zy5csp3323pac; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 04:54:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.109.35 with SMTP id hp3mr1580074wjb.55.1381319670170; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 04:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1si15845249wjz.122.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 04:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VTrz3-0007vR-4b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:31:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VTrz2-0007vI-H5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:31:16 +0100 Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.17]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VTryx-0006lB-2J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 12:31:15 +0100 Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ayzl1m0031ZXKqc5AzX9X3; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:31:09 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id azX81m00f0CFS1j3hzX88k; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:31:09 +0000 Message-ID: <003d01cec4e3$0cb8eff0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 07:31:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1381318269; bh=sRu6VeoPVjykItTpmIHgXH+/Maud863Lgqo9Zb3bI3w=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=Uy+6d3hhpDRJHw4HTE9+c08YfCIzja7Rsw4YvixA0k9BiZk4IKRNA6AtNwhCd2xOl zhPGfrX1Vdu2P+9Uv2BO1gsxacIHMGOXZ66VNtyR9n/hP/KtL16aPw1kTNte+KgOEK SHEq9j8g0RSdrQfhOuDJ4/7T0M6om+70gMTjKRevO9PZZKoY/vX/f7m1m4XapHPM+9 rd7ruAEO0CUhBQ1h06LHKxcUp4wvgtHAAO/0AWm85Y+4SUE3JbwA6KW8IfVszx5+Mw L2cvrudOOtDFouJSy/Z9drtNVPwZ3O0iya9u3B57L6yTGTHNb/7TWeBC2UloGjyG0Z 3mX6c8TCwSaRQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Further to previous post. Note to self: predicting conditions is risky business ... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: LF: Re: WSPR 15 T/A tonite Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 962 Stefan Further to previous post. Note to self: predicting conditions is risky business ... 2013-10-09 05:30 DK7FC 0.137610 -35 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2013-10-09 05:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -34 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2013-10-09 04:30 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2013-10-09 04:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -37 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2013-10-09 03:30 DK7FC 0.137610 -33 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2013-10-09 03:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2013-10-09 02:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 All this with unfavorable DST ... check it out: http://lasp.colorado.edu/space_weather/dsttemerin/dsttemerin.html Maybe Alan can chime in with his thoughts. Signal remained at a constant low level throughout the period. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:22 PM Subject: WSPR 15 T/A tonite > Stefan > > Nice copy of your WSPR15 considering DST is around -50 nT. Not sure condx will hold up as the > night progresses. > > 013-10-09 02:00 DK7FC 0.137610 -36 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XSR/2