Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp82764igb; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:47:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.93.3 with SMTP id cq3mr608312wjb.26.1382068052211; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ym3si31712199wjc.94.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VWzzp-0004hk-DO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:41:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VWzzo-0004hb-KT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:41:00 +0100 Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VWzzm-00067H-8j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:40:59 +0100 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eSYj1m0050cZkys53SgwxW; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:40:56 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eSgv1m00n0CFS1j3WSgwal; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:40:56 +0000 Message-ID: <003101cecbab$78a2e2b0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <000701cecb29$d06ee7f0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <525FCC72.3080506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002001cecb35$90568ea0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <525FFA57.1020001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <525FFAD3.2000406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005401cecb51$fb859bf0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <52608759.1070509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <526090AA.20402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:40:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1382064056; bh=+6hFZ2SqBFdgxncKRG+Hgp6mXKOIKU8ctST5QGcoGvg=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=ELu6ITa/wCc9gr5YqoJ6s9XfbV2EUierm7LsKroKpVnNOcwT8RwQ72/L/15t0VTYB bqmZ460YXLYIbhzsBVvAR2ClXFQY+32fvPKSVWUDC/Q7vePCjSuKupbJgpcxCat3fR qQcQ5jzJ7/x/ECjD5ZWco8i9cnLkctIwZtem6N+ee48L5cOUSHzaiecJRQT5mBxmhd hJUtGSThqbxMJNKSD8kULRhKD075cp3BBdMewbpRftosOCL3lYVCit5QuzONjSJKHO Bbo42spcLjuNym4QF9Sjc5nSROJoF++1AdxoAcdAPuj1equTciLQimz8xYfO8sWN+3 S3V+0VwIMQ8Cw== X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Surprised at poor s/n (-46 dBOp) on initial decode ... maybe we're in a fade. Progress monitored at : http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2ee80849a5d572dbc974bb207a527753 Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3049 Stefan Surprised at poor s/n (-46 dBOp) on initial decode ... maybe we're in a fade. Progress monitored at : http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 9:36 PM Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC Jay, Correction: Markus created a special file for me which makes the ramp time shorter than 1 ms. So now my PA can send OPDS with Markus' software and i am on air in this mode tonite until 06:15 UTC. Maybe you can detect me? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.10.2013 02:56, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Hi Jay, > > I wanted to give it a try tonite. First i wanted to use DF6NM's OPDS software which i would really > prefer over the ROS-OP stuff. But then i found that the sndoutpt.exe creates a ramp in the audio > tone. My FETs didn't like that at all, they made a crrrk at the beginning and end of each dash. > This is because the audio passes a comparator which makes a clear hard keyed tone for the mixer > which keys the IXDD414 anyway. FETs survived but it showed that i need to do hardware > modifications if i want to use Markus' tool. > In WSPR-15 it may be the same but then it is just 4 times per hour and in OP32 is is much more. > > Then i installed the standard Opera program which i find very annoying. It is not even possible to > select a TXD line of the RS232 which i normally use for PTT. When using the standard program i'm > generating the tone with SpecLab (on the "LF TX PC") and key the PTT with the program (on the > "LF/MF RX/TX PC"). Didn't work :-/ Soldered arround to use RTS instead. PTT was keyed when > pressing the tune button and released when pressing it again, as intended. But then, when pressing > "Beacon", the PTT was key down, permanent tone. > > Need a VOX or so... > > So i can do no OPDS tests tonite, sorry. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > PS: I'll continue with DFCW-90 now! > > > > Am 17.10.2013 18:00, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >> Stefan >> >> Wasn't expecting you to start transmitting OPDS today ... just a thought for the future. But if >> you want to, that's okay too. >> >> OPDS32 is capable of of decoding at about -50 dB s/n (relative to SSB bandwidth). >> >> Your call and grid is easily added at the receiving end. >> >> Jay >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:57 AM >> Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC >> >> >> PS: Jay, Markus, >> >> What is the S/N performance of OPDS compared to WSPR-15 (apart from the >> fact that the callsigns must be known in advance and that there is less >> information into one sequence) ?? >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 17.10.2013 16:55, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> Jay, >>> >>> Am 17.10.2013 14:36, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >>>> >>>> Several stations on this end are now set up to receive OP Deep Search ... including Garry K3SIW >>>> in IL. Being that far inland is quite a disadvantage for T/A signal reception compared to >>>> 'coastal' stations. >>> Garry got several WSPR-15 decodes of me last season, so i think he could make it in OPDS as >>> well. >>>> >>>> On my end I'm interested to see if it's possible to roll back the earliest T/A reception times >>>> (current best of about 2045Z mid season). There are probably other 'unknowns' waiting to be >>>> discovered along the way ;~) . >>> OK, i can give it a try. Not sure if i can make it today arround 20 UTC but i will try. >>> Am i already included in the OPDS list as a possible station? >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >