Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp122460igb; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:17:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.95.72 with SMTP id di8mr107420wjb.74.1382105848703; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i5si4369053wic.43.2013.10.18.07.17.28 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VXAFD-0006UM-8R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:37:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VXAFC-0006UD-O7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:37:34 +0100 Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.227]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VXAFA-0008HI-OK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:37:33 +0100 Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eci11m0011ei1Bg5CddWnP; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:37:30 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eddW1m00E0CFS1j3kddWKm; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:37:30 +0000 Message-ID: <000801cecc07$31693960$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <003901cecc03$912e4560$6d01a8c0@DELL4> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:37:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1382103450; bh=z3kc7m4B2AZbCjkUtG84wjG6NE4rah5so0qrmUl/XpM=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=WHNkVYxkDYXSJhGjuPpsSlLeqWzGy8GCtcUhMRTCeqaMP8nWqUT1Vui6SBKIXNRXy 3/GRBww+dWyE0vpAtOt+lmAs5TFT2pphiM4pnAxXArveP7q6a9ZWpMBcWRP5fjhSj4 7fW4wM3YSeXcnkv+l3lkbvCaGnAjfHbGYCDTLzGJ+9K3C//Kzby3Yuf/u8bnPFXkFW bLDt62AtUDdVW6KzgChi6kKyPAiCRD24kA//U5PA3MRVDVGLgc7ZDHNzsYZqBnSvs5 V8HPyMC+ejqthyNqDxLdZnWHY7kfg9gO+XPmFW6V17mi4CpJ8AqjExREsh9RVDRl8h PM5VV0+5mRb7A== X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OPDS T/A enthusiasts Stefan, here's my copy from last night. Missed the first transmission not knowing you were on the air. John managed to snag the earliest transmission and one more decode late in the morning. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.227 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3033 OPDS T/A enthusiasts Stefan, here's my copy from last night. Missed the first transmission not knowing you were on the air. John managed to snag the earliest transmission and one more decode late in the morning. 2013-10-18 04:29:01 DK7FC 6099km 137559.915Hz 14mHz -41.7dBOp 39% 15.2dB 2013-10-18 03:49:18 DK7FC 6099km 137559.915Hz 4mHz -41.7dBOp 99% 16.0dB 2013-10-18 03:09:15 DK7FC 6099km 137559.915Hz 4mHz -39.2dBOp 69% 16.0dB 2013-10-18 02:29:23 DK7FC 6099km 137559.915Hz 2mHz -46.0dBOp 100% 16.8dB Yes, I have the same question as to why OPDS32 s/n levels were so low ... as compared to WSPR15 the night before with essentially the same conditions. One never knows if conditions are identical or not ... that is why John and I ran our OP vs. WSPR tests last season 'heads up' both modes transmitted and received simultaneously. If you recall WSPR won. Might be interesting to try OPDS8. On the WSPR15 captures the night before I noticed a fair amount of QSB on many of the 15 minute time slots. The only true test of competing modes would be a 'heads up' competition with both modes transmitted and received simultaneously on the same setups. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2