Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp103014pad;
        Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.107.167 with SMTP id hd7mr12549473wib.13.1380526021340;
        Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pt5si7643306wjc.105.1969.12.31.16.00.00;
        Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1VQXRD-00075l-UC
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:58:35 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1VQXRD-00075c-6C
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:58:35 +0100
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <Laura.Zepam@gmx.de>)
	id 1VQXRB-0002yI-BK
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:58:34 +0100
Received:  from 3capp-gmx-bs42.server.lan ([172.19.170.94]) by
 mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id
 0M3PbS-1ViLP50zJo-00r2gU for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013
 08:58:31 +0200
Received: from [194.94.191.82] by 3capp-gmx-bs42.server.lan with HTTP; Mon
 Sep 30 08:58:31 CEST 2013
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-a018b555-288c-4b16-aa68-feb9a524d2d5-1380524311122@3capp-gmx-bs42>
From: LZ <Laura.Zepam@gmx.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:58:31 +0200 (CEST)
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <524864BC.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <524864BC.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:IBeOor88vulr8roT5sv83v4qie8c5/dvpOERbyTfxHZ
 m0Cy4qGNxcez0bzEVTXzvrDi5667ZidbMRFJ3ECe5XUyFiZoYR
 Sc744VDyoBnlbEFVpk3nMjqgZyJsNBidJES3HUUIo929zPM6EQ
 pv3BX8xQuoBBS8mWsXq5IUTK0+0J9ystGSX23fWl7ECMMilrju
 vvcUVNI1+aGKKHnd0olL6KmZEQt72U36LaS1eySrKxS2KG2Xgy
 +1f9lyVSgnqhv8vTXcDsISQvTXPR1PWvKnlq2WnBcXk+tw9W1j hu/u6k=
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Hi, Stephan wrote: > Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR
    meter on 630m? They are > specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but what
    about 472 kHz? [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.1 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (laura.zepam[at]gmx.de)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce
Subject: Aw: LF: HF SWR meters on MF?
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
	MIME_HTML_ONLY,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 22

<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Hi,</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>Stephan wrote:</div>

<div>&gt; Did someone try to use a normal HF SWR meter on 630m? They are<br/>
&gt; specificated down to 1800 kHz of course but what about 472 kHz?</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>I killed mine many years ago when transmitting &gt;100Watts at</div>

<div>longwaves. Blocking capacitors too small =&gt; Instrument kapput!</div>

<div>.</div>

<div>Check all blocking capacitors before using at low frequencies!</div>

<div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>Laura</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>Geschreibt von meine CaputPhone</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>