Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp75423pad; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:45:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.202.230 with SMTP id kl6mr14627894wjc.9.1380480320896; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x1si3189554wiw.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VQLeZ-0000FJ-GD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:23:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VQLeZ-0000F1-4I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:23:35 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VQLeX-0006V8-3k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:23:34 +0100 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8TINQiJ004763 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:23:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:23:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Clemens, > But for fast CW in my opinion a good agc is the most important factor > provided the rest of > the rx > is fairly decent no matter if it is digital or conventional. No AGC and a decent RF gain control is hard to beat! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: LF: Soft keying... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2977 Hello Clemens, > But for fast CW in my opinion a good agc is the most important factor > provided the rest of > the rx > is fairly decent no matter if it is digital or conventional. No AGC and a decent RF gain control is hard to beat! 73, Roelof, pa0rdt -- Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/