Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp6407pad; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.89.42 with SMTP id bl10mr6702241wib.47.1380379323636; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 07:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11si4893255wjn.34.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 07:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPvEB-0000DJ-G5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:10:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPvEB-0000D6-1Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:10:35 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPvE8-0005nu-OQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:10:33 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([91.57.79.195]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MFctN-1VcHZ40PO1-00Effu for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:10:32 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <23ht99dnd852tktkm8dwyomi.1380368630043@email.android.com> <5246D322.9060306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002501cebc4f$6a61ddc0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> In-Reply-To: <002501cebc4f$6a61ddc0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:10:34 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac68T4rzGQ9YmkiURZyaV0rMrVYctQAA+NEg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KS8fUVgYNvyFLuJxdNPHQ1kXzmcUGpOWCbv3TcWAX9DOdcrWziH SM7UK2eks0D26/RaKpa7tDMWE7B62cje9Et2u9Oul8TBLh9z+k+ld38yJuaHYjCTXK0ed8I bAdIclWGbOa+xHYNqnY1hR0gE0IGWCw/BI+L6RllBBFm9f0L24pTYd75MP1HfDVjFgmkPTn 8uDL+OK5r4fX8+/5hfNqw== X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >Hard keying also helps crack DX pileups. Perhaps a bit like when ssb stations crank up all controls of their transmitter to crack a pileup. They become louder - and very broad due to poor imd 3. But it seems to help. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 21e2055b299bd63ed331c37c8a3e15ca Subject: RE: LF: Soft keying... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1674 >Hard keying also helps crack DX pileups. Perhaps a bit like when ssb stations crank up all controls of their transmitter to crack a pileup. They become louder - and very broad due to poor imd 3. But it seems to help. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ=20 =20 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of=20 >jrusgrove@comcast.net >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 3:34 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: Soft keying... > >Hard keying also helps crack DX pileups. > >Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 > > >----- Original Message -----=20 >From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" >To: >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 9:01 AM >Subject: Re: LF: Soft keying... > > >Hi Christian, > >Yes i know. There are even special circuits to improve the shape of the >CW slope, giving better readability. See attachment. > >73, Stefan > > >Am 28.09.2013 13:43, schrieb C. Groeger: >> BTW, Stefan, >> under difficult conds with low signal strength (which is the=20 >case on 630 m) hard keying greatly=20 >> enhances readability of your CW ! >> >> And if you like QRQ, hard keyed CW is really essential for good copy! >> You can check that easily on Hf, QRQ op's use hard keying... >> >> 73, df5qg >> >> >> Christian Groeger >> >> Stefan Sch=E4fer schrieb: >> >> >>> Am 27.09.2013 20:51, schrieb Clemens Paul: >>> >>>> [...] >>>> If you are seriously interested in generating a key click=20 >free CW signal,there's an >>>> article about that >>>> in QST 5/97 and 6/97 dealing with class E amps which would=20 >also apply to class D amps. >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Clemens >>>> DL4RAJ >>>> >>> Yes. >>> Or that one: http://www.classeradio.com/classh.htm >>> >>> I even built something similar some months ago. It is=20 >possible to adjust >>> the power from 0...> 1 kW with a small potentiometer. Somehow >>> fascinating. It was intended to send slow hell on the LF PA, not key >>> click free CW. The project is maybe 90% finished but then=20 >other projects >>> got priority. Image: >>>=20 >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/20130927_211117.jpg You >>> can read the names of some ICs :-) >>> >>> BTW when will your MF PA be finished? >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> > > > > >----- >E-Mail ist virenfrei. >Von AVG =FCberpr=FCft - www.avg.de >Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virendatenbank: 3222/6705 -=20 >Ausgabedatum: 27.09.2013=20 >