Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp108272igb; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:12:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.171.7 with SMTP id aq7mr14098312wic.28.1379351570876; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h12si7646645wic.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VLbws-0004zZ-AR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:46:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VLbwr-0004zQ-Qt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:46:53 +0100 Received: from dub0-omc1-s25.dub0.hotmail.com ([157.55.0.224]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VLbwp-0006Gf-Va for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:46:52 +0100 Received: from DUB114-W73 ([157.55.0.237]) by dub0-omc1-s25.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:46:51 -0700 X-TMN: [l1M9FOz9t5TLPcmFSighICBS3ipbQR6y] X-Originating-Email: [bvgbob@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Lubos OK2BVG To: _RSGB_LF Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:46:50 +0200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: <8E3F6214-382F-4C11-B838-F94D36B30CBB@web.de>,, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2013 16:46:51.0115 (UTC) FILETIME=[57941BB0:01CEB2FC] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Marco and Warren!I didnīt test the stability, but there is written in the manual: "The stability 0,5 ppm" Yes, I think the same, X1M might be useful for LF and MW activities. I donīt expect, it will be better than my "big receivers", but it is really interesting. Lubos, OK2BVG [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [157.55.0.224 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (bvgbob[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: ab7de7439a3fce0b74220375dc6f18e8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_07764959-00d0-4ce6-8c52-301fa910ad87_" Subject: RE: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1730 --_07764959-00d0-4ce6-8c52-301fa910ad87_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Marco and Warren!I didn=B4t test the stability=2C but there is writt= en in the manual: "The stability 0=2C5 ppm" Yes=2C I think the same=2C X1M = might be useful for LF and MW activities. I don=B4t expect=2C it will be be= tter than my "big receivers"=2C but it is really interesting. Lubos=2C OK2BVG=20 Date: Mon=2C 16 Sep 2013 08:47:03 -0400 From: wd2xgj@gmail.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz Marco=2C Lubos=2C Is the frequency stability good enough for QRSS or WS= PR? 73 Warren On Mon=2C Sep 16=2C 2013 at 8:20 AM=2C Lubos OK2BVG wr= ote: =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hello Marco!By coincidence - I received the X1M two weeks ago :-)I haven=B4= t tested transmitter. But the receiver is not bad=2C indeed (...with an ex= ternal input filter =2C of course).=0A= Lubos=2C OK2BVG **************************************** > From: scholzmarco@web.de =0A= > Date: Mon=2C 16 Sep 2013 12:36:10 +0200 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=3B rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk =0A= > Subject: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475khz >=20 > Hello=2C > Received on the weekend the Chinese X1M HF-Transceiver. This Rig can tran= smit from abt. 0.1 - 30MHz=2C but has only bandpass filters on 80=2C40=2C29= =2C15 and 10m band. So i tried 475kHz with a external bandpass filter and i= got 5W in USB or CW (Not tried it=2C but this should work as well on 137KH= z). In combination with a bigger PA a relativ easy way to transmit on the l= ow bands. =0A= >=20 > vy73 > Marco=2C DD7PC =0A= --=20 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ=20 WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 =0A= = --_07764959-00d0-4ce6-8c52-301fa910ad87_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Marco and Warren!
I di= dn=B4t  =3Btest the stability=2C but there is written in the manual: "T= he stability 0=2C5 ppm" =3B
Yes=2C I think the same=2C X1M mi= ght be useful for LF and MW activities. I don=B4t expect=2C it will be bett= er than my "big receivers"=2C but it is really interesting.

<= /div>
Lubos=2C OK2BVG =3B

Date:= Mon=2C 16 Sep 2013 08:47:03 -0400
From: wd2xgj@gmail.com
To: rsgb_lf= _group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter tr= ansmitting well on 475khz

Marco=2C Lubos=2C
&nb= sp=3B  =3B  =3BIs the frequency stability good enough for QRSS or W= SPR?

73 Warren



On Mon=2C Sep 16= =2C 2013 at 8:20 AM=2C Lubos OK2BVG <=3Bbvgbob@hotmail.com>=3B wrote:
=0A=
=0A= =0A= =0A=
Hello Marco!
By coincidence - I received the X1M = two weeks ago :-)
I haven=B4t tested transmitter. But  =3Bthe= receiver is not bad=2C indeed (...with an external input filter =2C  = =3Bof course).
=0A=

Lubos=2C OK2BVG

**************= **************************



>=3B Fro= m: scholzmarco@web.= de
=0A= >=3B Date: Mon=2C 16 Sep 2013 12:36:10 +0200

>= =3B To: r= sgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=3B rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
=0A= >=3B Subject: LF: X1M Chinese QRP HF Transverter transmitting well on 475= khz
>=3B
>=3B Hello=2C
>=3B Re= ceived on the weekend the Chinese X1M HF-Transceiver. This Rig can transmit= from abt. 0.1 - 30MHz=2C but has only bandpass filters on 80=2C40=2C29=2C1= 5 and 10m band. So i tried 475kHz with a external bandpass filter and i got= 5W in USB or CW (Not tried it=2C but this should work as well on 137KHz). = In combination with a bigger PA a relativ easy way to transmit on the low b= ands.
=0A= >=3B
>=3B vy73
>=3B Marco=2C DD7PC
=
=0A=



--
73 Warren K2= ORS
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  = =3B WD2XGJ
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  = =3B  =3B WD2XSH/23
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B &nbs= p=3B  =3B  =3B WE2XEB/2
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B &nbs= p=3B  =3B  =3B  =3B WE2XGR/1

 =3B=0A=
= --_07764959-00d0-4ce6-8c52-301fa910ad87_--