Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp2646pad; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:26:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.122.33 with SMTP id lp1mr63998wjb.56.1380374792238; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dc3si4783037wjb.133.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPuOR-00088e-EG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:17:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPuOQ-00088U-Rq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:17:06 +0100 Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPuOO-0005Qw-2D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:17:05 +0100 Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ij15so2666498vcb.30 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:17:02 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dfxzapSStm9QZWfUWDfCFJ+hxDnK0Tio2FuBNQ6KBLk=; b=XgnIunaVGltE5PSYEUFYVO0bJb09PgH0JaKrTUPgXF1L/3KQCyowUo2qnG5cg/wsLy nZEPvbJ9kPQkGYe75qVghFp+Z2q8+PPN2n8FeMAazovMcM3pL5FZ9CLyeJJvsXaTR/Gj l2x8PLkwNxDqlhPuf6ED1kKTJBgKJjXG+/NOnaiVlEV8x7y6wKn4DVoG2vK42NSEJsLo ixtHyUDkDV8oGwZOd2ETiwhIg8cwFrdvTvqgi1yiYPMO/4i41lY+gWYCenKIqCMXq5Mv KoFqGiQDX6LUlOvSSi/RzyhA7cDyw9OjHK2ZKzJrlMwk0cXT9Nn1RveVrBI3+7H4vOKV 8vhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.133.66 with SMTP id pa2mr11729090veb.18.1380374221736; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.184.229 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:17:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3B6E076A8F0E4B52A7495CA0CDB51987@Clemens0811> References: <5244AB81.8020503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5245765A.3030301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52459149.7070307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00b401cebb94$29946cb0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <317DFD83703544938DA4CC8A5F5655B3@AGB> <5245BC6B.3090101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3B6E076A8F0E4B52A7495CA0CDB51987@Clemens0811> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 09:17:01 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Keep in mind that at the moment there are only 6 hams on the entire planet authorized to transmit on 73kHz and so far not more than 3 have been on, QRM from key clicks is about the last thing we have to worry about ! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.220.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wd2xgj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2ee80849a5d572dbc974bb207a527753 Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRSS OP WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b67317e24ee3304e7716bb8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2872 --047d7b67317e24ee3304e7716bb8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Keep in mind that at the moment there are only 6 hams on the entire planet authorized to transmit on 73kHz and so far not more than 3 have been on, QRM from key clicks is about the last thing we have to worry about ! 73 Warren On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Clemens Paul wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > >From my point of view the only real advantage of Opera is that > >you can use a simple keyed VFO, like in CW. But then some will > >complain about the key clicks :-) > > ...Which would be an issue only in CW. > If you are seriously interested in generating a key click free CW > signal,there's an > article about that > in QST 5/97 and 6/97 dealing with class E amps which would also apply to > class D amps. > > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fe= r > >Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:12 PM > >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > >Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRSS OP WSPR > > > > > --=20 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 --047d7b67317e24ee3304e7716bb8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Keep in mind that at the =A0moment there are only 6 hams o= n the entire planet authorized to transmit on 73kHz and so far not more tha= n 3 have been on, QRM from key clicks is about the last thing we have to wo= rry about !

73 Warren



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Clem= ens Paul <cpaul@gmx.net> wrote:
Hi Stefan,

>From my point of view the only real advantage of Opera is that
>you can use a simple keyed VFO, like in CW. But then some will
>complain about the key clicks :-)

...Which would be an issue only in CW.
If you are seriously interested in generating a key click free CW signal,th= ere's an
article about that
in QST 5/97 and 6/97 dealing with class E amps which would also apply to cl= ass D amps.

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ



>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org
>[mailto:owner-rsg= b_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fer
>Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:12 PM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@black= sheep.org
>Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRSS OP WSPR
>





--
73 Warren K2= ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1

=A0
--047d7b67317e24ee3304e7716bb8--