Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.93.2 with SMTP id cq2csp18149igb; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 19:17:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.37.227 with SMTP id b3mr3723481wik.24.1378606655249; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 19:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ck2si2228179wib.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 19:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) d=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VIUBy-00086X-MI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 02:53:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VIUBy-00086O-4C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 02:53:34 +0100 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VIUBw-0000Qo-Ac for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 02:53:33 +0100 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v19so4875872obq.11 for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:53:30 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IRBLxYbhH/8TsURkX7eSX9RTvJCt31otCJQpB9cdkwk=; b=w/23ux0RY1MgRQcLZj4O/7DopoQR2v/GX/hUBTfIeyEugiHHjDzno8H9vJzdhADCTj u5NiHbXomuwdA+0+9B0Cy9n4ZvRcxDQDMfV2+mEmJNhkbC7hvVxJhn1sknMQ7eVR97fl MGZt/hZ8DKeIs1hWQpLjh485h8iLH9GUSHw8Oeu6ipjunbdskYv1iQBZ0FsoSqqZAv2T LqbJUAGMI+zuCqiTJhhW0EVRk3KH9qf1UZ2vyFZ2bRcCZPZrwOSnTl40GY75Vo0o+KYl X9scevleGtFcbJIy0TcZEBE+2hUzGTH8+pafTJZpDxbxJOPm8CHDU25klnRZqk4tWCzA BLzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.51.196 with SMTP id m4mr6916605oeo.1.1378605210010; Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.55.129 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 21:53:29 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which he writes it off as worthless. "With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band." [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wd2xgj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c30920d4094f04e5d589e8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 467 --001a11c30920d4094f04e5d589e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which he writes it off as worthless. "With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band." Anyone on the list know Tony? Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish? -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 --001a11c30920d4094f04e5d589e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his = "Practical Wireless" column "Technical for the terrified&quo= t; this month on the 137 kHz band in which he writes it off as worthless.

"With the limitation of antenna efficiency togethe= r with a bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be d= one with this band."

=A0Anyone on the list kn= ow Tony?=A0
Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish?<= /div>


--
73 Warren K2ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 WE2XGR/1

=A0
--001a11c30920d4094f04e5d589e8--