Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp553543pad; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.206.244 with SMTP id lr20mr2989570wic.45.1380294729683; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gi5si3041280wjd.171.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPYVo-0000xJ-3L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:55:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPYVn-0000xA-J3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:55:15 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s20.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPYVl-00065b-NV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:55:14 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W95 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s20.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:55:12 -0700 X-TMN: [P3xaiNmY7ED5/T/0gy0G9rF4wjr/2lrH] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:55:11 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <5245765A.3030301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <5244AB81.8020503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<5245765A.3030301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2013 13:55:12.0282 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F8A27A0:01CEBB89] X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan; It is same here. But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at same time no go. I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than two years old. Big difference from little ACER PC! I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 kHz work. What freq might be best for UK/Euro work? I understand that 72.4 is not good in UK/Europe. Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments I am getting? Any suggestions appreciated-Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.31 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c40596c1cc3306f1877076595a921c57 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_85ba9533-3221-460d-9c1e-b73aa6372269_" Subject: RE: LF: Finally! X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1503 --_85ba9533-3221-460d-9c1e-b73aa6372269_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=3B It is same here. But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at same = time no go. =20 I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than two y= ears old. Big difference from little ACER PC! I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 kHz work. What fre= q might be best for UK/Euro work? I understand that 72.4 is not good in UK= /Europe. Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments I am getting? Any suggestions appreciated-Bob =20 Date: Fri=2C 27 Sep 2013 14:13:14 +0200 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Finally! =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Am 27.09.2013 01:14=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A= =0A= =0A= Stefan=3B =0A= I recall you had an old PC. What did you pick up for your new unit? Bob =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Bob=2C=20 =0A= =0A= It's nothing special=2C about 5 years old. 2 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM=2C 800=0A= MHz RAM clock frequency. But now i can run 7 SpecLab instances +=0A= WSPR-15 on LF + WSPR-2 on LF + WSPR-2 on MF PERMANENTLY. The CPU load=0A= is still below 25% :-) =0A= =0A= BTW the soundcard is able to run at 192 kS/s=2C so theoretically i could=0A= set up a 0...96 kHz grabber=2C including your 74 kHz section. However i=0A= do not yet have a suitable RX antenna because they all use low pass=0A= filters. Furthermore my location is not really superior for LF=0A= reception. Thus it is very unlikely that i can see a trace of you here.=0A= The UK hams and some of F are certainly in a better situation. That's=0A= why i mostly concentrate on the TX side :-) =0A= =0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC = --_85ba9533-3221-460d-9c1e-b73aa6372269_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan=3B
It is same here.&nb= sp=3B But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at same time no go.&= nbsp=3B
I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung&nbs= p=3Bless than two years old. =3B Big difference from little ACER PC!I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 =3BkHz work.&n= bsp=3B What freq might be best for UK/Euro work? =3B I understand that = 72.4 is not good in UK/Europe. =3B Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from= comments I am getting?
Any suggestions appreciated-Bob
 =3B
<= div>
Date: Fri=2C 27 Sep 2013 14:13:14 +0200
From= : Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Subject: Re: LF: Finally!

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
=0A= Am 27.09.2013 01:14=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
=0A= =0A=
Stefan=3B
=0A= I recall you had an old PC. =3B What did you pick up for your new unit?= Bob
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A= Hi Bob=2C
=0A=
=0A= It's nothing special=2C about 5 years old. 2 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM=2C 800=0A= MHz RAM clock frequency. But now i can run 7 SpecLab instances +=0A= WSPR-15 on LF + WSPR-2 on LF + WSPR-2 on MF PERMANENTLY. The CPU load=0A= is still below 25% :-)
=0A=
=0A= BTW the soundcard is able to run at 192 kS/s=2C so theoretically i could=0A= set up a 0...96 kHz grabber=2C including your 74 kHz section. However i=0A= do not yet have a suitable RX antenna because they all use low pass=0A= filters. Furthermore my location is not really superior for LF=0A= reception. Thus it is very unlikely that i can see a trace of you here.=0A= The UK hams and some of F are certainly in a better situation. That's=0A= why i mostly concentrate on the TX side :-)
=0A=
=0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
= --_85ba9533-3221-460d-9c1e-b73aa6372269_--