Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp576481pad; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:19:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.72.148 with SMTP id d20mr4250897wiv.21.1380316767620; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10si3661626wjz.142.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VPfHO-0004aU-5I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:08:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VPfHN-0004aK-Jj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:08:49 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s8.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VPfHL-0008NX-Hy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:08:48 +0100 Received: from BLU180-W86 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:08:46 -0700 X-TMN: [PWh/VGNDjVQjktNDcNZopUpgfxIFxq2A] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:08:45 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: <5244AB81.8020503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3B6E076A8F0E4B52A7495CA0CDB51987@Clemens0811> <5245DC89.4020302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1380314453.597263885@f385.i.mail.ru>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2013 21:08:46.0050 (UTC) FILETIME=[C0F42420:01CEBBC5] X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: G; If I could handle more voltage at the base of my vertical I have the capability of going to 5 KV plate volts @ 2 amps plate current. I would have to use a keyed CW mode to run this rig like that. But it would kick ass. I wouldn't want to run a steady state keydown carrier much over 4-5 KW. So OP 65 would have 3+ db jump over anything else right off the bat! But can't handle the ant input voltage-this is a log house and wood constructed garage for the shack-fire dept over 2 miles away in town-this place would burn to the ground-Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 5f3d51ad98dd7d967f54e1b86b99caac Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_63840069-07c3-4552-9ce1-e2f8e955d345_" Subject: RE: LF: Re[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1625 --_63840069-07c3-4552-9ce1-e2f8e955d345_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable G=3B If I could handle more voltage at the base of my vertical I have the capabi= lity of going to 5 KV plate volts @ 2 amps plate current. I would have to = use a keyed CW mode to run this rig like that. But it would kick ass. I w= ouldn't want to run a steady state keydown carrier much over 4-5 KW. So OP= 65 would have 3+ db jump over anything else right off the bat! But can't = handle the ant input voltage-this is a log house and wood constructed garag= e for the shack-fire dept over 2 miles away in town-this place would burn t= o the ground-Bob =20 From: g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri=2C 27 Sep 2013 21:55:50 +0100 Subject: Re: LF: Re[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= We have still the last working OP2 =0A= qso mode =2C which can send ' I have two cats' =0A= =0A= But the decode s/n is -20 dB =2C =0A= ROS-MF-2 is round -26 dB -28dB about =0A= the same=0A= as wspr-2 =2C but a full free running =0A= data mode =0A= =0A= At speeds less than 1 baud =2C =0A= would any one use such a mode =2C there was =0A= a ROS 0.1 Baud =0A= 7/8 db lower =2C but very very slow =0A= ! .. =0A= =0A= In the start =2C was the problem of =0A= translating audio to rf on 136/500 =2C =0A= but now that =0A= seems to be much less of a problem =0A= =0A= =0A= 73-G=2C =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= From: Alex R7NT =0A= Sent: Friday=2C September 27=2C 2013 9:40 PM=0A= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A= =0A= Subject: LF: Re[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR=0A= Dear LF enthusiasts! my opinion is not very original in =0A= English - in Russian I would write A4+++ :-) "CQ R7NT K" QRSS20 =0A= - 28' 40'" simple TX=2C visual decode=2C subjective report=2C random =0A= time=2C QSO mode.... DFCW20 - 11' 4" little more =0A= complicated TX=2C visual decode=2C subjective report=2C random time=2C =0A= QSO mode.... "any call ++" Qp32 - 32' simple TX=2C =0A= software based decode/report=2C random time=2C no QSO mode.... WSPR-15 =0A= - 15' little more complicated TX=2C software based decode/report=2C =0A= 00'=2C 15'=2C 30'=2C 45' times to start=2C no QSO mode........ QRSS20 =0A= ~~=3DDFCW20 ~~=3DOP32 ~~=3DWSPR-15 Comparing OP32 and WSPR-15 =0A= (OP8/WSPR-2) is equally as comparing QRSS20 and DFCW20 (QRSS3/ =0A= DFCW3) I personally like DFCW=2C JT9-5..10 more.... but I have the little =0A= choise now....=20 ...maybe WOLF agn? 73! Alex R7NT 136.73.ru =0A= = --_63840069-07c3-4552-9ce1-e2f8e955d345_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
G=3B
If I could handle = =3Bmore voltage at the base of my vertical I have the capability of going t= o 5 KV plate volts @ 2 amps plate current. =3B I would have to use a ke= yed CW mode to run =3Bthis rig like that. =3B But it would kick ass= . =3B =3BI wouldn't want to run a steady state keydown carrier much= over 4-5 KW. =3B So OP 65 would have 3+ db jump over anything else rig= ht off the bat! =3B But can't handle the ant input voltage-this is a lo= g house and wood constructed garage for the shack-fire dept over 2 miles aw= ay in town-this place would burn to the ground-Bob
 =3B

From: g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk
To: rsgb_lf_group@blac= ksheep.org
Date: Fri=2C 27 Sep 2013 21:55:50 +0100
Subject: Re: LF: R= e[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
We have still =3B the =3B last =3B working =3B OP2&nbs= p=3B =3B =0A= qso =3B mode =2C which =3B can =3B send =3B =3B ' I hav= e two cats' =3B =0A=
=0A=
But =3B the =3B decode =3B =3B s/n is =3B =3B = -20 dB =2C =0A= ROS-MF-2 =3B =3B is =3B round =3B -26 dB =3B -28dB = =3B =3B about =0A= the =3B same
=0A=
as =3B wspr-2 =3B =2C but a =3B full =3B free =3B = running =3B =0A= data =3B mode
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
At =3B speeds =3B less =3B than =3B 1 =3B baud&nbs= p=3B =2C =0A= would =3B any one =3B use =3B such a =3B mode =2C there&nbs= p=3B was =3B =0A= a =3B ROS =3B 0.1 Baud
=0A=
7/8 =3B db lower =3B =2C but =3B very =3B very =3B= slow =3B =0A= ! =3B ..
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
In the =3B start =2C was the =3B problem =3B of =3B = =0A= translating =3B =3B audio =3B to =3B rf =3B on 136/500&= nbsp=3B =2C =0A= but =3B now =3B that
=0A=
seems =3B to =3B be =3B much =3B less =3B of a&nbs= p=3B problem =0A=
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
73-G=2C
=0A=
=0A=

=0A=
=0A= =0A=
Sent: Friday=2C September 27=2C 2013 9:40 PM
=0A= =0A=
Subject: LF: Re[2]: Re: QRSS OP WSPR
=0A=

Dear LF enthusiasts!
my opinion is not very original in = =0A= English - in Russian I would write A4+++ :-)

"CQ R7NT K"
QRSS20 = =0A=  =3B-  =3B28' 40'"  =3Bsimple TX=2C visual decode=2C subjective= report=2C random =0A= time=2C QSO mode....
DFCW20  =3B- 11' 4"  =3B  =3B  =3Bl= ittle more =0A= complicated TX=2C =3Bvisual decode=2C =3Bsubjective report=2C = =3Brandom time=2C =0A= QSO mode....

"any call ++"
Qp32  =3B- 32'  =3B  =3Bsi= mple TX=2C =0A= software based decode/report=2C =3Brandom time=2C no =3BQSO mode...= .
WSPR-15 =0A= - 15'  =3Blittle more complicated TX=2C =3Bsoftware based =3Bde= code/report=2C =0A= 00'=2C 15'=2C 30'=2C 45' times to start=2C =3Bno =3BQSO mode.......= .

QRSS20 =0A= ~~=3DDFCW20 ~~=3DOP32 ~~=3DWSPR-15

Comparing OP32 and =3BWSPR-15= =0A= (OP8/WSPR-2) =3Bis equally as comparing =3BQRSS20 and DFCW20 (QRSS3= / =0A= DFCW3)
I personally like DFCW=2C JT9-5..10 more.... but I have the littl= e =0A= choise now....
...maybe WOLF agn?

73! Alex R7NT  =3B136.73.r= u
=0A=
= --_63840069-07c3-4552-9ce1-e2f8e955d345_--